Literature DB >> 20232095

Patients' and dentists' perception of dental appearance.

Christian J Mehl1, Sönke Harder, Matthias Kern, Stefan Wolfart.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the patients' and dentists' perception of dental appearance. Based on internationally accepted guidelines about dental esthetics, a questionnaire was developed to measure "dental appearance" (QDA). Eleven items defined a QDA sum score (0 = "absolutely satisfied", 44 = "absolutely dissatisfied"). The QDA was completed by 16 patients (eight women, eight men, mean age 63 ± 9 years) before and after a complete oral rehabilitation. Forty-two dentists evaluated the esthetics before and after rehabilitation on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = "absolutely unesthetic", 100 = "absolutely esthetic"). The patients' quoting showed a significant esthetic improvement (QDA sum score) from 22 before treatment to 3.5 after treatment (P ≤ 0.001). Although most of the dentists judged an improvement in most of the patients dental appearances, no significant correlation could be found between patients' and dentists' judgment regarding dental appearance (r = -0.13-0.53, P > 0.05). When evaluating the influence of age, gender, and experience on rating dental appearance, no significant differences (P > 0.05) could be found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232095     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0393-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  24 in total

1.  Promoting esthetic procedures in the prosthodontic practice.

Authors:  George Priest; Judy Priest
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions.

Authors:  Stefan Wolfart; Helen Thormann; Sandra Freitag; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.612

3.  The evolution of digital dentistry and the digital dental team.

Authors:  Edward A McLaren; Lee Culp; Sherri White
Journal:  Dent Today       Date:  2008-09

4.  Dental esthetic satisfaction in adults.

Authors:  L M Neumann; C Christensen; C Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Psychodynamic factors contributing to esthetic dental failures.

Authors:  C G Sheets; N Levinson
Journal:  Compendium       Date:  1993-12

6.  Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.

Authors:  Vincent O Kokich; Vincent G Kokich; H Asuman Kiyak
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man.

Authors:  J D Sterrett; T Oliver; F Robinson; W Fortson; B Knaak; C M Russell
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy.

Authors:  Asja Celebić; Dubravka Knezović-Zlatarić; Milan Papić; Vlado Carek; Ivo Baucić; Jasmina Stipetić
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Use of mucogingival surgical procedures to enhance esthetics.

Authors:  E P Allen
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1988-04

10.  Does the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire measure dental appearance?

Authors:  Christian Mehl; Matthias Kern; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Mona Wolfart; Simone Brunzel; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  6 in total

1.  Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).

Authors:  Edoardo Rella; Paolo De Angelis; Tiziano Nardella; Antonio D'Addona; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Influence of Practitioner-Related Placement Variables on the Compressive Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins-An In Vitro Clinical Simulation Study.

Authors:  Tamar Brosh; Moshe Davidovitch; Avi Berg; Aviran Shenhav; Raphael Pilo; Shlomo Matalon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale.

Authors:  Esben Boeskov Øzhayat
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of Gender on the Patient's Assessment of Restorations on the Upper Anterior Teeth.

Authors:  Ela Kristek Zorić; Maja Žagar; Dubravka Knezović Zlatarić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-03

5.  Preserving esthetics, occlusion and occlusal vertical dimension in a patient with fixed prostheses seeking dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Al Baker; Syed Rashid Habib; Mohammad D Al Amri
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2016-10-18

6.  Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.

Authors:  Stephanie Bela Andela; Ragna Lamprecht; Mike T John; Swaha Pattanaik; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.