Literature DB >> 16360682

Swe1p responds to cytoskeletal perturbation, not bud size, in S. cerevisiae.

John J McNulty1, Daniel J Lew.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: S. cerevisiae cells must grow to a critical size in G1 in order to pass start and enter the cell cycle. A recent study proposed that in addition to the mother size control in G1, the bud must grow to a critical bud size in G2 in order to enter mitosis. Insufficient bud size would cause G2 arrest enforced by the mitotic inhibitor Swe1p, explaining previous findings that some perturbations that block bud growth also trigger Swe1p-dependent cell-cycle arrest.
RESULTS: We tested the critical-bud-size hypothesis. We found that halting bud growth by inactivation of the myosin Myo2p did not trigger Swe1p-dependent arrest in budded cells, even when the buds were very small. Moreover, Swe1p did not affect cell-cycle progression in unstressed cells, even when bud size was decreased by overriding G1 size control. Actin depolymerization did cause Swe1p-dependent arrest in small-budded but not large-budded cells, as previously reported. However, we found that the key determinant of cell-cycle arrest in those circumstances was not bud size, but rather the relative abundance of the Swe1p mitotic inhibitor and the mitosis-promoting cyclins.
CONCLUSIONS: Swe1p does not respond to insufficient bud size. Instead, actin stress empowers Swe1p to promote arrest. The effectiveness of Swe1p in promoting that arrest declines as cells progress through the cell cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360682     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

Review 1.  Morphogenesis and the cell cycle.

Authors:  Audrey S Howell; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Forced periodic expression of G1 cyclins phase-locks the budding yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  G Charvin; F R Cross; E D Siggia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cell cycle checkpoint regulators reach a zillion.

Authors:  Kimberly M Yasutis; Keith G Kozminski
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Frequency control of cell cycle oscillators.

Authors:  Catherine Oikonomou; Frederick R Cross
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Characterization of dependencies between growth and division in budding yeast.

Authors:  Michael B Mayhew; Edwin S Iversen; Alexander J Hartemink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Loss of mitochondrial DNA in the yeast cardiolipin synthase crd1 mutant leads to up-regulation of the protein kinase Swe1p that regulates the G2/M transition.

Authors:  Shuliang Chen; Dongmei Liu; Russell L Finley; Miriam L Greenberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Polarization of the yeast pheromone receptor requires its internalization but not actin-dependent secretion.

Authors:  Dmitry V Suchkov; Reagan DeFlorio; Edward Draper; Amber Ismael; Madhushalini Sukumar; Robert Arkowitz; David E Stone
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 8.  Cell-Size Control.

Authors:  Amanda A Amodeo; Jan M Skotheim
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  The Adder Phenomenon Emerges from Independent Control of Pre- and Post-Start Phases of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle.

Authors:  Devon Chandler-Brown; Kurt M Schmoller; Yonatan Winetraub; Jan M Skotheim
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Identification of Clb2 residues required for Swe1 regulation of Clb2-Cdc28 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Fangfang Hu; Yan Gan; Oscar M Aparicio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.