BACKGROUND: Epidemiologists often use menstrual cycle patterns as indicators of endocrine function in environmental and occupational studies, yet few studies have considered whether menstrual cycle characteristics are associated with fertility or pregnancy outcome. METHODS: We prospectively studied 470 women to determine whether cycle length or bleed length were associated with fertility or spontaneous abortion. Women completed daily diaries with information on menstrual bleeding, intercourse, birth control use, and covariates. For each menstrual cycle, women collected at least 2 urine samples, which were assayed for human chorionic gonadotropin to define early pregnancies. Women were followed for 1 year or until the end of a clinical pregnancy. RESULTS: Cycles with lengths of 30 to 31 days preceded cycles with the highest fecundity. Shorter cycles were less likely to be followed by conception (fecundity ratio [FR] = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-1.0). Compared with 30- to 31-day cycles, conceptions after shorter and longer cycles were more likely to be spontaneously aborted (for shorter cycles, odds ratio [OR] = 3.0 [95% CI = 0.9-9.6] and for longer cycles, OR = 3.0 [0.9-10.6]). Cycles with 5 days of menstrual bleeding had the highest fecundity. Cycles with up to 4 days of bleeding had lower fecundity (for bleed lengths of 4 days, FR = 0.5 [0.3-0.8] and for bleed lengths less than 4 days, FR = 0.6 [0.3-0.9]). Spontaneous abortion was less likely after bleeds greater than 5 days (OR = 0.4 [0.1-1.1]) when compared with 5-day bleeds. CONCLUSIONS: Menstrual cycle characteristics appear to be associated with fertility and spontaneous abortion.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologists often use menstrual cycle patterns as indicators of endocrine function in environmental and occupational studies, yet few studies have considered whether menstrual cycle characteristics are associated with fertility or pregnancy outcome. METHODS: We prospectively studied 470 women to determine whether cycle length or bleed length were associated with fertility or spontaneous abortion. Women completed daily diaries with information on menstrual bleeding, intercourse, birth control use, and covariates. For each menstrual cycle, women collected at least 2 urine samples, which were assayed for human chorionic gonadotropin to define early pregnancies. Women were followed for 1 year or until the end of a clinical pregnancy. RESULTS: Cycles with lengths of 30 to 31 days preceded cycles with the highest fecundity. Shorter cycles were less likely to be followed by conception (fecundity ratio [FR] = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-1.0). Compared with 30- to 31-day cycles, conceptions after shorter and longer cycles were more likely to be spontaneously aborted (for shorter cycles, odds ratio [OR] = 3.0 [95% CI = 0.9-9.6] and for longer cycles, OR = 3.0 [0.9-10.6]). Cycles with 5 days of menstrual bleeding had the highest fecundity. Cycles with up to 4 days of bleeding had lower fecundity (for bleed lengths of 4 days, FR = 0.5 [0.3-0.8] and for bleed lengths less than 4 days, FR = 0.6 [0.3-0.9]). Spontaneous abortion was less likely after bleeds greater than 5 days (OR = 0.4 [0.1-1.1]) when compared with 5-day bleeds. CONCLUSIONS: Menstrual cycle characteristics appear to be associated with fertility and spontaneous abortion.
Authors: Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Krista F Huybrechts; Elizabeth E Hatch Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Melanie H Jacobson; Penelope P Howards; Lyndsey A Darrow; Juliana W Meadows; James S Kesner; Jessica B Spencer; Metrecia L Terrell; Michele Marcus Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Kathleen A Wannemuehler; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Metrecia L Terrell; Michele Marcus Journal: Stat Med Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Maureen A Cooney; Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Bridget M McGuiness; Courtney D Lynch Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Joseph B Stanford; Craig J McKinnon; Shruthi Mahalingaiah Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Anne Marie Zaura Jukic; Clarice R Weinberg; Donna D Baird; Allen J Wilcox Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.681