Literature DB >> 16356796

Nuclear medicine studies of the prostate, testes, and bladder.

Suman Jana1, M Donald Blaufox.   

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been a significant advancement in imaging of urologic diseases. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and positron emission tomography (PET) are still experiencing new developments in urology. Despite these many technological advances, the initial diagnostic procedure for a patient with suspected prostate cancer (PC) is multiple site blind prostate biopsies. There is a need for a noninvasive metabolic imaging modality to direct the site of biopsy to decrease the sampling error. MRS seems promising but as it is a costly and more time-consuming test, further studies are needed to evaluate its clinical utility. Currently, PET does not play any role to direct biopsy. Acetate and choline appear to be better tracers than FDG for the detection of a prostate lesion, however, further well-organized studies are needed before any of these agents can be used clinically. Incidental detection of intense focal uptake in the prostate during whole body PET scanning should be evaluated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and TRUS-guided biopsy. Although FDG is inferior to other tracers for primary staging, it may be useful in selected patients with suspected high-grade cancer. The role of ProstaScint scan is still controversial for detection of recurrent PC. This study may be helpful for evaluating nodal metastases when PSA is elevated and bone scan is negative. Bone scan remains the study of choice when bone metastases are suspected (PSA>15-20 ng/mL+/-bone pain). Acetate and choline provide better accuracy than FDG in the detection of local soft tissue disease, nodal involvement, and distant metastases. High FDG uptake may be indicative of more aggressive and possibly androgen-independent disease. PET/CT with any of the above PET tracers will most likely be preferred to the PET scan alone due to better localization of a hot lesion in PET/CT. Nuclear medicine studies also have been used to evaluate acute scrotum and testicular neoplasms. Scrotal scintigraphy has lost its popularity to Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of the acute scrotum. In testicular tumors, FDG-PET appears to be superior to conventional imaging modalities in initial staging, detection of residual/recurrence, and monitoring treatment response. Tumor markers after treatment occasionally are elevated and cannot locate the site of recurrence, FDG-PET can play a very important role in this regard. Nuclear medicine studies also have been used to evaluate diseases of the urinary bladder. Radionuclide cystography is more sensitive and has less than 1/20 the radiation exposure of the conventional contrast enhanced micturating cystourethrogram (MCU). However, the utility of FDG-PET in the evaluation of bladder cancer seems to be limited to the evaluation of distant metastases. 11C-Methionine and choline may be a better option for local and nodal disease due to their negligible excretion in the urine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16356796     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2005.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  30 in total

1.  Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Cristiana Ragano Caracciolo; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano; Antonio Orlacchio; Roberta Danieli; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  [Impact of nuclear medicine imaging techniques for lymph node surgery].

Authors:  L S Freudenberg; G Holl; S P Müller; S J Rosenbaum-Krumme; J Sciuk; A Bockisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Dual-phase FDG-PET: delayed acquisition improves hepatic detectability of pathological uptake.

Authors:  V Arena; A Skanjeti; R Casoni; A Douroukas; E Pelosi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Imaging prostate cancer: an update on positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Jacek Capala
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  PET/CT and MRI in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  J Cancer Sci Ther       Date:  2012-07-30

6.  A comparative study of radiolabeled bombesin analogs for the PET imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xiang Hu; Hongguang Liu; Lihong Bu; Xiaowei Ma; Kai Cheng; Jinbo Li; Mei Tian; Hong Zhang; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences: why and how?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Thierry Vitry; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  PET imaging of VPAC1 expression in experimental and spontaneous prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kaijun Zhang; Mohan R Aruva; Nylla Shanthly; Christopher A Cardi; Satish Rattan; Chirag Patel; Christopher Kim; Peter A McCue; Eric Wickstrom; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and radioimmunotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Jacek Capala; Peter Oehr
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Retroperitoneal lymph nodes in transitional cell carcinoma of the kidney and ureter.

Authors:  Shilajit D Kundu; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.