Literature DB >> 16356077

Global competition dictates local suppression in pattern rivalry.

Alexander Maier1, Nikos K Logothetis, David A Leopold.   

Abstract

Certain pairs of visual patterns, when superimposed as if transparent, elicit a wavering percept in which one or the other pattern can enjoy temporary periods of exclusive visibility. This multistable perceptual phenomenon is called monocular rivalry or pattern rivalry (PR) and is most pronounced when the component patterns are faint and devoid of detail. The principal mechanisms that give rise to PR continue to be a topic of speculation. In the present study, we examine the determinants of exclusive dominance during PR using a novel stimulus in which a central portion is free of conflict. By observing the properties of suppression in this so-called rivalry-free region, we demonstrate that perception is driven largely by the global and holistic interpretation of the patterns, rather than by the need to resolve local spatial conflict. The suppression of this central region was often complete and varied as a function of the parameters of the global stimulus, including the size of the surround region, its ocular configuration, and stereoscopic depth ordering. Suppression also varied as a function of pattern continuity across the central region as well as with the temporal offset of the overlapping components. These findings demonstrate that the visibility or invisibility of a pattern is not fundamentally a product of local processing, but is instead shaped by the brain's global interpretive assumptions regarding the composition of the stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16356077     DOI: 10.1167/5.9.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Decision time, slow inhibition, and theta rhythm.

Authors:  Anteo Smerieri; Edmund T Rolls; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effects of attention on visual experience during monocular rivalry.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Peter J Kohler; Gideon P Caplovitz; Thalia P Wheatley; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Does feature integration affect resolution of multiple simultaneous forms of ambiguity?

Authors:  Ryan Lange; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Perceptual rivalry across animal species.

Authors:  Olivia Carter; Bruno van Swinderen; David A Leopold; Shaun P Collin; Alexander Maier
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.028

6.  Filling-in rivalry: Perceptual alternations in the absence of retinal image conflict.

Authors:  Zhimin Chen; Gerrit W Maus; David Whitney; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  On the Discovery of Monocular Rivalry by Tscherning in 1898: Translation and Review.

Authors:  Robert P O'Shea; Urte Roeber; Nicholas J Wade
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.