Literature DB >> 16355740

The perception of distances and spatial relationships in natural outdoor environments.

J Farley Norman1, Charles E Crabtree, Anna Marie Clayton, Hideko F Norman.   

Abstract

The ability of observers to perceive distances and spatial relationships in outdoor environments was investigated in two experiments. In experiment 1, the observers adjusted triangular configurations to appear equilateral, while in experiment 2, they adjusted the depth of triangles to match their base width. The results of both experiments revealed that there are large individual differences in how observers perceive distances in outdoor settings. The observers' judgments were greatly affected by the particular task they were asked to perform. The observers who had shown no evidence of perceptual distortions in experiment 1 (with binocular vision) demonstrated large perceptual distortions in experiment 2 when the task was changed to match distances in depth to frontal distances perpendicular to the observers' line of sight. Considered as a whole, the results indicate that there is no single relationship between physical and perceived space that is consistent with observers' judgments of distances in ordinary outdoor contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16355740     DOI: 10.1068/p5304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

Review 1.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Individual differences in distance perception.

Authors:  Russell E Jackson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Environmental surfaces and the compression of perceived visual space.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jessica S Holmin; Hideko F Norman; Amanda M Beers; Alexandria M Boswell; Jacob R Cheeseman; Angela G Stethen; Cecilia Ronning
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion.

Authors:  Brennan J Klein; Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Does this computational theory solve the right problem? Marr, Gibson, and the goal of vision.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  A comparison of two theories of perceived distance on the ground plane: The angular expansion hypothesis and the intrinsic bias hypothesis.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-05-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.