Literature DB >> 16355158

Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of portal hypertension.

Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagán1, Jaime Bosch.   

Abstract

The evidence that endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has greater efficacy and fewer side effects than endoscopic injection sclerotherapy has renewed interest in endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension. The introduction of multishot band devices, which allow the placement of 5-10 bands at a time, has made the technique much easier to perform, avoiding the use of overtubes and their related complications. EBL sessions are usually repeated at 2 week intervals until varices are obliterated, which is achieved in about 90% of patients after 2-4 sessions. Variceal recurrence is frequent, with 20-75% of patients requiring repeated EBL sessions. According to current evidence, nonselective beta-blockers are the preferred treatment option for prevention of a first variceal bleed, whereas EBL should be reserved for patients with contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers. Nonselective beta-blockers, probably in association with the vasodilator isosorbide mononitrate, and EBL are good treatment options to prevent recurrent variceal rebleeding. The efficacy of EBL might be increased by combining it with beta-blocker therapy. Patients who are intolerant, have contraindications or bled while receiving primary prophylaxis with beta-blockers must be treated with EBL. In the latter situation, EBL should be added to rather than replace beta-blocker therapy. EBL, in combination with vasoactive drugs, is the recommended form of therapy for acute esophageal variceal bleeding; however, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy can be used in the acute setting if EBL is technically difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16355158     DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1743-4378


  29 in total

1.  Endoscopic band ligation versus pharmacological therapy for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lan Li; Chaohui Yu; Youming Li
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  The management of patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ka-Kit Li; James Neuberger
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Historical overview and review of current day treatment in the management of acute variceal haemorrhage.

Authors:  Neil Rajoriya; Dhiraj Tripathi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Adherence and adequacy of therapy for esophageal varices prophylaxis.

Authors:  Haripriya Maddur; Suraj Naik; Ali A Siddiqui; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Pathophysiology and Management of Variceal Bleeding.

Authors:  Saleh A Alqahtani; Sunguk Jang
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Management of Esophageal Varices.

Authors:  James F Trotter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2006-07

7.  Splenectomy with endoscopic variceal ligation is superior to splenectomy with pericardial devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Nan Lin; Bo Liu; Rui-Yun Xu; He-Ping Fang; Mei-Hai Deng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Treatment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Khurram Bari; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension.

Authors:  Gin-Ho Lo
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.047

10.  Results of a new method to stop acute bleeding from esophageal varices: implantation of a self-expanding stent.

Authors:  J Zehetner; A Shamiyeh; W Wayand; R Hubmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.