Literature DB >> 16354785

Hunting archer fish match their take-off speed to distance from the future point of catch.

Saskia Wöhl1, Stefan Schuster.   

Abstract

Archer fish can shoot down insect prey with a sharp jet of water. Fish usually fire from positions that are not directly below their target so that a dislodged insect falls ballistically with a horizontal velocity component. Only 100 ms after the insect is on its path both the shooter and other school members can initiate a rapid turn and then head straight in the direction of the later point of impact of their falling prey. The quick turn and subsequent take-off are performed ;open-loop', based on the initial values of the falling insect's motion. We report here that archer fish can not only take off in the direction of the later point of impact but also predict its distance. Distance information allows the fish to adjust their take-off speed so that they would arrive within a narrow time slot slightly (about 50 ms) after their prey's impact, despite large differences in the size of the aligning turn and in the distance to be covered. Selecting a constant speed program with matched speed and catching the insect on the move minimizes frictional losses. The initial speed of starting fish is slightly but systematically too slow and is increased later so that the fish arrive 20 ms earlier than expected and often make the catch on a higher than take-off speed. The variability of later speed changes suggests a systematic ;error' in the take-off, as if the fish underestimated distance. However, this apparent deficiency seems well adapted to the fish catching their prey at a high speed: if later the fish had no possibility to correct an initial error then it is better to start slightly too slow in order to minimize the risk of overshooting the point of catch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16354785     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  The effect of steepness of temporal resource gradients on spatial root allocation.

Authors:  Hagai Shemesh; Ran Rosen; Gil Eshel; Ariel Novoplansky; Ofer Ovadia
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2011-09

2.  Blind(fold)ed by science: a constant target-heading angle is used in visual and nonvisual pursuit.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Igor Dolgov; Eric McManama; Charles Swank; Andrew B Maynor; Kahlin Kelly; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  Orientation saliency without visual cortex and target selection in archer fish.

Authors:  Alik Mokeichev; Ronen Segev; Ohad Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Born knowing: tentacled snakes innately predict future prey behavior.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  High speed coding for velocity by archerfish retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Viola Kretschmer; Friedrich Kretschmer; Malte T Ahlers; Josef Ammermüller
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  The Brain of the Archerfish Toxotes chatareus: A Nissl-Based Neuroanatomical Atlas and Catecholaminergic/Cholinergic Systems.

Authors:  Naomi Karoubi; Ronen Segev; Mario F Wullimann
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.856

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.