OBJECTIVE: To examine how improved attention to nutritional status and dietary intake, achieved through the employment of dietetic assistants (DAs), will affect postoperative clinical outcome among elderly women with hip fracture. DESIGN: Open prospective randomised controlled trial, comparing conventional nursing care with the additional nutritional support provided by DA. SETTING:Thirty-eight bedded acute trauma ward in a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All but 11 of 344 consecutive admissions with acute nonpathological hip fracture were approached. Three hundred and eighteen (93%) agreed to inclusion. Sixteen were ineligible as they were immediately transferred to another acute ward, were managed conservatively or died preoperatively. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative mortality in the acute trauma unit. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative mortality at 4 months after fracture, length of stay, energy intake and nutritional status. RESULTS: DA-supported participants were less likely to die in the acute ward (4.1 versus 10.1%, P = 0.048). This effect was still apparent at 4 month follow-up (13.1 versus 22.9%, P = 0.036). DA-supported subjects had significantly better mean daily energy intake (1,105 kcal versus 756 kcal/24 h, 95% CI 259-440 kcal/24 h, P<0.001), significantly smaller reduction in mid-arm circumference during their inpatient stay (0.39 cm, P = 0.002) and nonsignificantly favourable results for other anthropometric and laboratory measurements. CONCLUSION: Dietetic or nutrition assistants are being introduced in units across the UK. This, the largest ever study of nutritional support after hip fracture, shows that their employment significantly reduced patients' risk of dying in the acute trauma unit; an effect that persisted at 4 month follow-up.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine how improved attention to nutritional status and dietary intake, achieved through the employment of dietetic assistants (DAs), will affect postoperative clinical outcome among elderly women with hip fracture. DESIGN: Open prospective randomised controlled trial, comparing conventional nursing care with the additional nutritional support provided by DA. SETTING: Thirty-eight bedded acute trauma ward in a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All but 11 of 344 consecutive admissions with acute nonpathological hip fracture were approached. Three hundred and eighteen (93%) agreed to inclusion. Sixteen were ineligible as they were immediately transferred to another acute ward, were managed conservatively or died preoperatively. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative mortality in the acute trauma unit. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative mortality at 4 months after fracture, length of stay, energy intake and nutritional status. RESULTS: DA-supported participants were less likely to die in the acute ward (4.1 versus 10.1%, P = 0.048). This effect was still apparent at 4 month follow-up (13.1 versus 22.9%, P = 0.036). DA-supported subjects had significantly better mean daily energy intake (1,105 kcal versus 756 kcal/24 h, 95% CI 259-440 kcal/24 h, P<0.001), significantly smaller reduction in mid-arm circumference during their inpatient stay (0.39 cm, P = 0.002) and nonsignificantly favourable results for other anthropometric and laboratory measurements. CONCLUSION: Dietetic or nutrition assistants are being introduced in units across the UK. This, the largest ever study of nutritional support after hip fracture, shows that their employment significantly reduced patients' risk of dying in the acute trauma unit; an effect that persisted at 4 month follow-up.
Authors: K E Charlton; C Nichols; S Bowden; K Lambert; L Barone; M Mason; M Milosavljevic Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Antonio De Vincentis; Astrid Ursula Behr; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Bravi; Anna Castaldo; Lucia Galluzzo; Giovanni Iolascon; Stefania Maggi; Emilio Martini; Alberto Momoli; Graziano Onder; Marco Paoletta; Luca Pietrogrande; Mauro Roselli; Mauro Ruggeri; Carmelinda Ruggiero; Fabio Santacaterina; Luigi Tritapepe; Amedeo Zurlo; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Caroline E Wyers; José J L Breedveld-Peters; Petronella L M Reijven; Svenjhalmar van Helden; Nick A Guldemond; Johan L Severens; Aart D Verburg; Berry Meesters; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Pieter C Dagnelie Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Vibeke Juliebø; Maria Krogseth; Eva Skovlund; Knut Engedal; Torgeir B Wyller Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 6.053