Literature DB >> 16354049

Complexation of the carbonate, nitrate, and acetate anions with the uranyl dication: density functional studies with relativistic effective core potentials.

Wibe A de Jong1, Edoardo Aprà, Theresa L Windus, Jeffrey A Nichols, Robert J Harrison, Keith E Gutowski, David A Dixon.   

Abstract

The structures and vibrational frequencies of uranyl carbonates, [UO2(CO3)n](2-2n) and [(UO2)3(CO3)6]6-, uranyl nitrates, [UO2(NO3)n](2-n), and uranyl acetates, [UO2(CH3COO)n](2-n) (n = 1,2,3) have been calculated by using local density functional theory (LDFT). Only bidentate ligand coordination modes to the uranyl dication have been modeled. The calculated structures and frequencies are compared to available experimental data, including IR, Raman, X-ray diffraction, and EXAFS solution and crystal structure data. The energetics of ligand binding have been calculated using the B3LYP hybrid functional. In general, the structural and vibrational results at the LDFT level are in good agreement with experimental results and provide realistic pictures of solution phase and solid-state behavior. For the [UO2(CO3)3]6- anion, calculations suggest that complexity in the CO3(2-) stretching signature upon complexation is due to the formation of C=O and C-O domains, the latter of which can split by as much as 300 cm(-1). Assessment of the binding energies indicate that the [UO2(CO3)2]2- anion is more stable than the [UO2(CO3)3]4- anion due to the accumulation of excess charge, whereas the tri-ligand species are the most stable in the nitrate and acetate anions.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16354049     DOI: 10.1021/jp0541462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  7 in total

1.  Detection and identification of solids, surfaces, and solutions of uranium using vibrational spectroscopy.

Authors:  Grace Lu; Amanda J Haes; Tori Z Forbes
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 22.315

2.  Variable denticity in carboxylate binding to the uranyl coordination complexes.

Authors:  Gary S Groenewold; Wibe A de Jong; Jos Oomens; Michael J Van Stipdonk
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Matrix-Independent Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Detection of Uranyl Using Electrospun Amidoximated Polyacrylonitrile Mats and Gold Nanostars.

Authors:  Grace Lu; Adam J Johns; Binita Neupane; Hoa T Phan; David M Cwiertny; Tori Z Forbes; Amanda J Haes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Emerging investigator series: entrapment of uranium-phosphorus nanocrystals inside root cells of Tamarix plants from a mine waste site.

Authors:  Lucia Rodriguez-Freire; Cherie L DeVore; Eliane El Hayek; Debora Berti; Abdul-Mehdi S Ali; Juan S Lezama Pacheco; Johanna M Blake; Michael N Spilde; Adrian J Brearley; Kateryna Artyushkova; José M Cerrato
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  Direct spectroscopic speciation of the complexation of U(VI) in acetate solution.

Authors:  Günther Meinrath; Dorota Kwiatek; Zbigniew Hnatejko; Stefan Lis
Journal:  Monatsh Chem       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.451

6.  Structural Analysis of the Complexation of Uranyl, Neptunyl, Plutonyl, and Americyl with Cyclic Imide Dioximes.

Authors:  Deborah A Penchoff; Charles C Peterson; Jon P Camden; James A Bradshaw; John D Auxier; George K Schweitzer; David M Jenkins; Robert J Harrison; Howard L Hall
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-10-24

7.  Quantum mechanical calculation of aqueuous uranium complexes: carbonate, phosphate, organic and biomolecular species.

Authors:  James D Kubicki; Gary P Halada; Prashant Jha; Brian L Phillips
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.215

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.