Literature DB >> 33325952

Emerging investigator series: entrapment of uranium-phosphorus nanocrystals inside root cells of Tamarix plants from a mine waste site.

Lucia Rodriguez-Freire1, Cherie L DeVore2, Eliane El Hayek3, Debora Berti4, Abdul-Mehdi S Ali5, Juan S Lezama Pacheco6, Johanna M Blake7, Michael N Spilde5, Adrian J Brearley5, Kateryna Artyushkova8, José M Cerrato2.   

Abstract

We investigated the mechanisms of uranium (U) uptake by Tamarix (salt cedars) growing along the Rio Paguate, which flows throughout the Jackpile mine near Pueblo de Laguna, New Mexico. Tamarix were selected for this study due to the detection of U in the roots and shoots of field collected plants (0.6-58.9 mg kg-1), presenting an average bioconcentration factor greater than 1. Synchrotron-based micro X-ray fluorescence analyses of plant roots collected from the field indicate that the accumulation of U occurs in the cortex of the root. The mechanisms for U accumulation in the roots of Tamarix were further investigated in controlled-laboratory experiments where living roots of field plants were macerated for 24 h or 2 weeks in a solution containing 100 μM U. The U concentration in the solution decreased 36-59% after 24 h, and 49-65% in two weeks. Microscopic and spectroscopic analyses detected U precipitation in the root cell walls near the xylems of the roots, confirming the initial results from the field samples. High-resolution TEM was used to study the U fate inside the root cells, and needle-like U-P nanocrystals, with diameter <7 nm, were found entrapped inside vacuoles in cells. EXAFS shell-by-shell fitting suggest that U is associated with carbon functional groups. The preferable binding of U to the root cell walls may explain the U retention in the roots of Tamarix, followed by U-P crystal precipitation, and pinocytotic active transport and cellular entrapment. This process resulted in a limited translocation of U to the shoots in Tamarix plants. This study contributes to better understanding of the physicochemical mechanisms affecting the U uptake and accumulation by plants growing near contaminated sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33325952      PMCID: PMC8479813          DOI: 10.1039/d0em00306a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  57 in total

1.  Uptake of uranium by aquatic plants growing in fresh water ecosystem around uranium mill tailings pond at Jaduguda, India.

Authors:  V N Jha; R M Tripathi; N K Sethy; S K Sahoo
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Control of Tamarix in the Western United States: implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration.

Authors:  Patrick B Shafroth; James R Cleverly; Tom L Dudley; John P Taylor; Charles van Riper; Edwin P Weeks; James N Stuart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Uptake and binding of uranyl ions by barley roots.

Authors:  A W Robards; M E Robb
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater-river interaction zone.

Authors:  John M Zachara; Philip E Long; John Bargar; James A Davis; Patricia Fox; Jim K Fredrickson; Mark D Freshley; Allan E Konopka; Chongxuan Liu; James P McKinley; Mark L Rockhold; Kenneth H Williams; Steve B Yabusaki
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Uranium(VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto background sediments from the F-Area Savannah River Site.

Authors:  Wenming Dong; Tetsu K Tokunaga; James A Davis; Jiamin Wan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Residential proximity to abandoned uranium mines and serum inflammatory potential in chronically exposed Navajo communities.

Authors:  Molly E Harmon; Johnnye Lewis; Curtis Miller; Joseph Hoover; Abdul-Mehdi S Ali; Chris Shuey; Miranda Cajero; Selita Lucas; Katherine Zychowski; Bernadette Pacheco; Esther Erdei; Sandy Ramone; Teddy Nez; Melissa Gonzales; Matthew J Campen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 7.  Biogeochemical redox processes and their impact on contaminant dynamics.

Authors:  Thomas Borch; Ruben Kretzschmar; Andreas Kappler; Philippe Van Cappellen; Matthew Ginder-Vogel; Andreas Voegelin; Kate Campbell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Incorporation of oxidized uranium into Fe (hydr)oxides during Fe(II) catalyzed remineralization.

Authors:  Peter S Nico; Brandy D Stewart; Scott Fendorf
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Reduction of uranium(VI) by mixed iron(II)/iron(III) hydroxide (green rust): formation of UO2 nanoparticles.

Authors:  Edward J O'Loughlin; Shelly D Kelly; Russell E Cook; Roseann Csencsits; Kenneth M Kemner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Mining and Environmental Health Disparities in Native American Communities.

Authors:  Johnnye Lewis; Joseph Hoover; Debra MacKenzie
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.