Literature DB >> 16353274

The influence of risk estimates obtained from maternal serum screening on amniocentesis rates.

V M Mueller1, T Huang, A M Summers, S H M Winsor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of Down syndrome risk estimates obtained from maternal serum screening (MSS) on women's choices regarding amniocentesis.
METHODS: Women who screened positive for Down syndrome by an Ontario MSS program between 1993 and 1998 were grouped on the basis of their risk estimate and ethnicity. Amniocentesis uptake rates between the groups were compared in order to determine how the MSS risk estimate influenced uptake.
RESULTS: Analysis of 16 792 women showed that amniocentesis uptake rates increased as the estimated risk increased. Uptake in women < or = 35 was higher than that for older women (70% vs 60%, p = 0.001). Uptake in Caucasian and Asian women was higher than the uptake in Black women (67% vs 49%, p = 0.001). Women aged 35 years or older were more likely to proceed with amniocentesis if the MSS risk estimate was higher than their age-specific risk.
CONCLUSION: The increase in amniocentesis rate paralleled the increase in MSS risk estimate for Down syndrome. Risk-specific amniocentesis rates are higher in women aged less than 35 years. Women aged 35 years or older whose risk estimate by MSS is lower than their age-specific risk are less likely to opt for amniocentesis. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16353274     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

1.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake.

Authors:  Reana Tischler; Louanne Hudgins; Yair J Blumenfeld; Henry T Greely; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Kristie Keeton; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.