Literature DB >> 1635117

The double-J ureteral stent: in vivo and in vitro flow studies.

W A Hübner1, E G Plas, M L Stoller.   

Abstract

Although most ureters can now be stented, the rate of ureteral obstruction from extrinsic compression remains relatively high. To illuminate the mechanisms of obstruction in these patients we performed 20 in vivo pressure-flow investigations in 14 patients with indwelling ureteral Double-J stents. All patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy tube in place. Our investigations revealed proper drainage to the bladder in 17 of the 20 studies at an average renal pelvic pressure of 19.9 cm. water. Vesicorenal reflux was noted at an average bladder pressure of 20 cm. water in 17 studies. Three stents appeared to be obstructed. They showed no drainage to the bladder but also no reflux. To evaluate the in vivo results we then performed an in vitro study of pressure-flow characteristics under conditions simulating ureteral obstruction. At physiological flow rates different ureteral stents showed no major differences in pressure-flow characteristics. With compression and kinking, flow resistance in softer stents was notably greater than in hard stents. Therefore, we believe that in patients with suspected extrinsic compression of the ureter hard Double-J stents should be used. Vesicorenal reflux appears to be a reliable predictor of stent function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1635117     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36572-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  [Prosthetic pyelovesical and pyelocutanous bypass. A palliative therapy concept in tumor-induced chronic hydronephprosis].

Authors:  H Loertzer; A Jurczok; S Wagner; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Authors:  Kaiyang Yin; Prajan Divakar; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  [Duplex ureteral stenting for intrinsic and extrinsic ureteral strictures: an effective and elegant alternative].

Authors:  F-C von Rundstedt; D Lazica; A S Brandt; M Rathert; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent.

Authors:  Manuel Ritter; Patrick Krombach; Thomas Knoll; Maurice Stephan Michel; Axel Haecker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-18

5.  Sequential polyurethane-poly(methylmethacrylate) interpenetrating polymer networks as ureteral biomaterials: mechanical properties and comparative resistance to urinary encrustation.

Authors:  D S Jones; M C Bonner; S P Gorman; M Akay; P F Keane
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Stiffness Analysis of Reinforced Ureteral Stents Against Radial Compression: In vitro Study.

Authors:  Benoît Vogt
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-11-27

7.  Is ureteral stent an effective way to deliver drugs such as bacillus Calmette-Guérin to the upper urinary tract? An experimental study.

Authors:  Fernando Korkes; Willy Baccaglini; Marcel Aranha Silveira
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-03-27

8.  Analysis of Ureteral Tumour Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction: Towards Reshaping an Optimal Stent.

Authors:  Benoît Vogt; Laure-Hélène Blanchet
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-10-27

9.  Letter to the editor, international urology and nephrology-in silico-in vitro-in vivo: can numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) replace studies of the urinary tract?

Authors:  W Kram; N Buchholz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.370

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.