Literature DB >> 16349215

Field evaluation of two colorimetric coliphage detection methods.

M M Ijzerman1, J O Falkinham, R B Reneau, C Hagedorn.   

Abstract

Two new methods for coliphage detection, a colorimetric agar-based (CAB) method and a liquid colorimetric presence-absence (LCPA) method, were compared to the coliphage method proposed by the American Public Health Association (APHA; Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1992). Both new methods are based on the induction of beta-galactosidase in Escherichia coli and the release of the enzyme through a lytic cell infection. The released enzyme then cleaves a chromogenic substrate which produces a colored reaction product. Ninety split water samples from four different sources were tested. A total of 52 samples were positive by the CAB method, 52 were positive by the LCPA method, and 53 were positive by the APHA method. Results indicated that (i) the CAB and LCPA methods were as sensitive in coliphage detection as the APHA method, (ii) both the CAB and LCPA methods were easier to read and interpret than the APHA method, and (iii) the CAB method detected more coliphages in a positive sample than the APHA method in two of the four types of water sources. Importantly, the rapid and simple LCPA method was as reliable and sensitive as either of the two agar-based methods in coliphage detection.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 16349215      PMCID: PMC201398          DOI: 10.1128/aem.60.3.826-830.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  Improved method for coliphage detection based on beta-galactosidase induction.

Authors:  M M Ijzerman; C Hagedorn
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.014

2.  Estimation of low numbers of Escherichia coli bacteriophage by use of the most probable number method.

Authors:  Y Kott
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-03

3.  Practical direct plaque assay for coliphages in 100-ml samples of drinking water.

Authors:  W O Grabow; P Coubrough
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  A note on a membrane filtration method for the concentration and enumeration of bacteriophages from water.

Authors:  R N Purdy; B N Dancer; M J Day; D J Stickler
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1985-02

5.  A liquid, colorimetric presence-absence coliphage detection method.

Authors:  M M Ijzerman; J O Falkinham; C Hagedorn
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 2.014

6.  A simplified method for coliphage detection in natural waters.

Authors:  J D Isbister; J A Simmons; W M Scott; J F Kitchens
Journal:  Acta Microbiol Pol       Date:  1983

7.  Factors affecting the enumeration of coliphages in sewage and sewage-polluted waters.

Authors:  A H Havelaar; W M Hogeboom
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  Comparison of membrane filtration and Autoanalysis Colilert presence-absence techniques for analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking water samples.

Authors:  C M Lewis; J L Mak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Comparison of selective media for assay of coliphages in sewage effluent and lake water.

Authors:  J E Kennedy; G Bitton; J L Oblinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M J Allen; D B Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.