Literature DB >> 16347341

Microbial ecophysiology of whey biomethanation: comparison of carbon transformation parameters, species composition, and starter culture performance in continuous culture.

M Chartrain1, L Bhatnagar, J G Zeikus.   

Abstract

Changes in lactose concentration and feed rate altered bacterial growth and population levels in a whey-processing chemostat. The bacterial population and methane production levels increased in relation to increased lactose concentrations comparable to those in raw whey (6%) and converted over 96% of the substrate to methane, carbon dioxide, and cells. Sequential increases in the chemostat dilution rate demonstrated excellent biomethanation performance at retention times as low as 25 h. Retention times shorter than 25 h caused prevalent bacterial populations and methane production to decrease, and intermediary carbon metabolites accumulated in the following order: acetate, butyrate, propionate, lactate, ethanol, and lactose. Bacterial species dominated in the chemostat as a function of their enhanced substrate uptake and growth kinetic properties. The substrate uptake kinetic properties displayed by the mixed chemostat population were equivalent to those of individual species measured in pure culture, whereas the growth kinetic properties of species in mixed culture were better than those measured in pure culture. A designed starter culture consisting of Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Methanosarcina barkeri, and Methanobacterium formicicum displayed biomethanation performance, which was similar to that of a diverse adapted mixed-culture inoculum, in a continuous contact digestor system to which 10 g of dry whey per liter was added. Preserved starter cultures were developed and used as inocula for the start-up of a continuous anaerobic digestion process that was effective for biomethanation of raw whey at a retention time of 100 h.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16347341      PMCID: PMC203823          DOI: 10.1128/aem.53.5.1147-1156.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  19 in total

1.  Conversion of Cellulose to Methane and Carbon Dioxide by Triculture of Acetivibrio cellulolyticus, Desulfovibrio sp., and Methanosarcina barkeri.

Authors:  V M Laube; S M Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Methanogenesis from sucrose by defined immobilized consortia.

Authors:  W J Jones; J P Guyot; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Microbial ecophysiology of whey biomethanation: characterization of bacterial trophic populations and prevalent species in continuous culture.

Authors:  M Chartrain; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Isolation and Characterization of a Thermophilic Strain of Methanosarcina Unable to Use H(2)-CO(2) for Methanogenesis.

Authors:  S H Zinder; R A Mah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effects of Temperature on Methanogenesis in a Thermophilic (58 degrees C) Anaerobic Digestor.

Authors:  S H Zinder; T Anguish; S C Cardwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Growth and methanogenesis by Methanosarcina strain 227 on acetate and methanol.

Authors:  M R Smith; R A Mah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Influence of CH4 production by Methanobacterium ruminantium on the fermentation of glucose and lactate by Selenomonas ruminantium.

Authors:  M Chen; M J Wolin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Kinetic parameters and relative turnovers of some important catabolic reactions in digesting sludge.

Authors:  H F Kaspar; K Wuhrmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Characterization of an acetate-decarboxylating, non-hydrogen-oxidizing methane bacterium.

Authors:  A J Zehnder; B A Huser; T D Brock; K Wuhrmann
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium.

Authors:  M J Latham; M J Wolin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitative microbiological analysis of bacterial community shifts in a high-rate anaerobic bioreactor treating sulfite evaporator condensate.

Authors:  U Ney; A J Macario; E Conway de Macario; A Aivasidis; S M Schoberth; H Sahm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Significance of Formate Transfer versus Hydrogen Transfer during Syntrophic Methanogenesis in Flocs.

Authors:  Jurgen H Thiele; J Gregory Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Role of Floc Formation in Syntrophic Methanogenesis.

Authors:  Jurgen H Thiele; M Chartrain; J Gregory Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bacterial ecology of abattoir wastewater treated by an anaerobic digestor.

Authors:  Linda Jabari; Hana Gannoun; Eltaief Khelifi; Jean-Luc Cayol; Jean-Jacques Godon; Moktar Hamdi; Marie-Laure Fardeau
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.476

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.