Literature DB >> 16346452

Methanogenesis from sucrose by defined immobilized consortia.

W J Jones1, J P Guyot, R S Wolfe.   

Abstract

A bacterial consortium capable of sucrose degradation primarily to CH(4) and CO(2) was constructed, with acetate as the key methanogenic precursor. In addition, the effect of agar immobilization on the activity of the consortium was determined. The primary fermentative organism, Escherichia coli, produced acetate, formate, H(2), and CO(2) (known substrates for methanogens), as well as ethanol and lactate, compounds that are not substrates for methanogens. Oxidation of the nonmethanogenic substrates, lactate and ethanol, to acetate was mediated by the addition of Acetobacterium woodii and Desulfovibrio vulgaris. The methanogenic stage was accomplished by the addition of the acetophilic methanogen Methanosarcina barkeri and the hydrogenophilic methanogen Methanobacterium formicicum. Results of studies with low substrate concentrations (0.05 to 0.2% [wt/vol]), a growth-limiting medium, and the five-component consortium indicated efficient conversion (40%) of sucrose carbon to CH(4). Significant decreases in yields of CH(4) and rates of CH(4) production were observed if any component of the consortium was omitted. Approximately 70% of the CH(4) generated occurred via acetate. Agar-immobilized cells of the consortium exhibited yields of CH(4) and rates of CH(4) production from sucrose similar to those of nonimmobilized cells. The rate of CH(4) production decreased by 25% when cysteine was omitted from reaction conditions and by 40% when the immobilized consortium was stored for 1 week at 4 degrees C.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16346452      PMCID: PMC239601          DOI: 10.1128/aem.47.1.1-6.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  19 in total

Review 1.  The biology of methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  J G Zeikus
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-06

Review 2.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group.

Authors:  W E Balch; G E Fox; L J Magrum; C R Woese; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1979-06

3.  A simple method for the quantitative determination of muramic acid.

Authors:  O Hadzija
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 4.  Metabolic interactions among intestinal microorganisms.

Authors:  M J Wolin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminantium in a pressureized atmosphere.

Authors:  W E Balch; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  H2 production by Selenomonas ruminantium in the absence and presence of methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  C C Scheifinger; B Linehan; M J Wolin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-04

7.  Methanogenesis from acetate: enrichment studies.

Authors:  L Baresi; R A Mah; D M Ward; I R Kaplan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Kinetics of acetate metabolism during sludge digestion.

Authors:  P H Smith; R A Mah
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-05

9.  Methane formation from fructose by syntrophic associations of Acetobacterium woodii and different strains of methanogens.

Authors:  J U Winter; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium.

Authors:  M J Latham; M J Wolin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  10 in total

1.  Microbial ecophysiology of whey biomethanation: comparison of carbon transformation parameters, species composition, and starter culture performance in continuous culture.

Authors:  M Chartrain; L Bhatnagar; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Layered structure of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and filter reactor.

Authors:  F A MacLeod; S R Guiot; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bioconversion of Gelatin to Methane by a Coculture of Clostridium collagenovorans and Methanosarcina barkeri.

Authors:  M K Jain; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Methane Production from Formate by Syntrophic Association of Methanobacterium bryantii and Desulfovibrio vulgaris JJ.

Authors:  J P Guyot; A Brauman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Significance of Formate Transfer versus Hydrogen Transfer during Syntrophic Methanogenesis in Flocs.

Authors:  Jurgen H Thiele; J Gregory Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Role of Floc Formation in Syntrophic Methanogenesis.

Authors:  Jurgen H Thiele; M Chartrain; J Gregory Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization.

Authors:  L Raskin; L K Poulsen; D R Noguera; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in anaerobic biofilms.

Authors:  L Raskin; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Characterization of microbial communities in anaerobic bioreactors using molecular probes.

Authors:  L Raskin; D Zheng; M E Griffin; P G Stroot; P Misra
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.271

10.  Influence of Phosphorus and Cell Geometry on the Fractionation of Sulfur Isotopes by Several Species of Desulfovibrio during Microbial Sulfate Reduction.

Authors:  Shikma Zaarur; David T Wang; Shuhei Ono; Tanja Bosak
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.