Literature DB >> 16346072

Competitive Abilities of Rhizobium meliloti Strains Considered to Have Potential as Inoculants.

H J van Rensburg1, B W Strijdom.   

Abstract

Twenty four strains of Rhizobium meliloti considered to have potential for inoculant production were grouped in pairs and tested for their ability to compete for nodulation on Medicago sativa, Medicago truncatula, and Medicago littoralis. At the outset, each pair of strains, which consisted of a wild type and a selected streptomycin-resistant mutant of another strain, was tested in an autoclaved soil. Six strain pairs, each consisting of a good and a poor competitor, reacted consistently when tested in each of five other autoclaved soils; eight pairs consisting of strains with comparable competitive abilities varied in their reactions in some of the soils, or even in the same soil when retested. An effect of soil pH on competitive ability was observed with some of these strains. Not all of the strains identified as good competitors on one or more of the Medicago spp. in the autoclaved soils were able to nodulate these plants satisfactorily in a field soil containing an established population of R. meliloti. Strain RF24, which seemed to be the best competitor on each of the three Medicago spp., grouped among the less effective strains on two of the legumes. Two strains of R. meliloti frequently used for inoculant production differed markedly with regard to competitive ability; this places some doubt on the relevancy of singling out competitive ability for special attention when selecting a strain for inoculant production.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 16346072      PMCID: PMC241975          DOI: 10.1128/aem.44.1.98-106.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  High Survivability of Cheese Whey-Grown Rhizobium meliloti Cells upon Exposure to Physical Stress.

Authors:  N Bissonnette; R Lalande
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Methods To Alter the Recovery and Nodule Location of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Inoculant Strains on Field-Grown Soybeans.

Authors:  B J Kamicker; W J Brill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Possible Involvement of Phage-Like Structures in Antagonism of Cowpea Rhizobia by Rhizobium trifolii.

Authors:  M V Joseph; J D Desai; A J Desai
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Studies on the Inoculation and Competitiveness of a Rhizobium leguminosarum Strain in Soils Containing Indigenous Rhizobia.

Authors:  J Meade; P Higgins; F O'gara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Influence of Location, Host Cultivar, and Inoculation on the Composition of Naturalized Populations of Rhizobium meliloti in Medicago sativa Nodules.

Authors:  E S Bromfield; I B Sinha; M S Wolynetz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Unaltered Nodulation Competitiveness of a Strain of Bradyrhizobium sp. (Lotus) after a Decade in Soil.

Authors:  H H Lochner; B W Strijdom; I J Law
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Variation in Preference for Rhizobium meliloti Within and Between Medicago sativa Cultivars Grown in Soil.

Authors:  E S Bromfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Improvement of Rhizobium inoculants.

Authors:  A S Paau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Influence of Environmental Factors on Interstrain Competition in Rhizobium japonicum.

Authors:  R M Kosslak; B B Bohlool
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Effectiveness of Rhizobium strains used in inoculants after their introduction into soil.

Authors:  H J van Rensburg; B W Strijdom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.