Literature DB >> 16344853

Human dignity: a guide to policy making in the biotechnology era?

Timothy Caulfield1, Roger Brownsword.   

Abstract

This article explores the ways in which human dignity is used in debates about controversial biotechnologies, including biobanks, human gene patents, stem cell research and human cloning. Increasingly, human dignity is used as a form of general condemnation and as blanket justification for regulatory restraint. However, this use of human dignity marks a significant departure from the traditional, human-rights informed view of human dignity that has dominated bioethics debates for decades. In addition, on its own, it stands as dubious justification for policies that are aimed at constraining controversial biotechnologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16344853     DOI: 10.1038/nrg1744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  10 in total

1.  Stem cell research, scientific freedom and the commodification concern.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Ubaka Ogbogu
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research?

Authors:  Amedeo Santosuosso; Valentina Sellaroli; Elisabetta Fabio
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  What is the scope for the interpretation of dignity in research involving human subjects?

Authors:  Lawrence Burns
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-16

4.  The property/privacy conundrum over human tissue.

Authors:  Patricia Roche
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-09

5.  Embryonic stem cell patents and human dignity.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-03-29

6.  The impact of human gene patents on genetic testing in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Naomi Hawkins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Human Non-persons, Feticide, and the Erosion of Dignity.

Authors:  Daryl Pullman
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Values and value conflicts in implementation and use of preconception expanded carrier screening - an expert interview study.

Authors:  Amal Matar; Mats G Hansson; Anna T Höglund
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras.

Authors:  Alison Harvey; Brian Salter
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2012-02-21

Review 10.  The biogenetical revolution of the Council of Europe - twenty years of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention).

Authors:  Oktawian Nawrot
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2018-05-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.