Literature DB >> 17922198

Embryonic stem cell patents and human dignity.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

This article examines the assertion that human embryonic stem cells patents are immoral because they violate human dignity. After analyzing the concept of human dignity and its role in bioethics debates, this article argues that patents on human embryos or totipotent embryonic stem cells violate human dignity, but that patents on pluripotent or multipotent stem cells do not. Since patents on pluripotent or multipotent stem cells may still threaten human dignity by encouraging people to treat embryos as property, patent agencies should carefully monitor and control these patents to ensure that patents are not inadvertently awarded on embryos or totipotent stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922198      PMCID: PMC2695597          DOI: 10.1007/s10728-007-0045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  25 in total

1.  Respecting what we destroy. Reflections on human embryo research.

Authors:  M J Meyer; L J Nelson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Embryo and stem cell research in the United States: history and politics.

Authors:  D C Wertz
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights (revised draft).

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull Med Ethics       Date:  1997-03

4.  On the moral and legal status of abortion.

Authors:  Mary Anne Warren
Journal:  Monist       Date:  1973-01

5.  Who or what is the preembryo?

Authors:  Richard A McCormick
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1991-03

6.  Genes, religion and society: the developing views of the churches.

Authors:  Ronald Cole-Turner
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Cloning humans from the perspective of the Christian churches.

Authors:  Ronald Cole-Turner
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Dignity is a useless concept.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-20

9.  The commercialization of human stem cells: ethical and policy issues.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2002

10.  The patentability of human embryonic stem cells in Europe.

Authors:  Gerard Porter; Chris Denning; Aurora Plomer; John Sinden; Paul Torremans
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  4 in total

1.  Defining "research" in the US and EU: contrast of Sherley v. Sebelius and Brüstle v. Greenpeace rulings.

Authors:  Maude L Cuchiara; James Lawford Davies; Kirstin R W Matthews
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Will CRISPR Germline Engineering Close the Door to an Open Future?

Authors:  Rachel L Mintz; John D Loike; Ruth L Fischbach
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Research integrity in China: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Weiqin Zeng; David Resnik
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.294

4.  Patents on Technologies of Human Tissue and Organ Regeneration from Pluripotent Human Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Xuejun H Parsons; Yang D Teng; Dennis A Moore; Evan Y Snyder
Journal:  Recent Pat Regen Med       Date:  2011
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.