Literature DB >> 16344413

The American public and the Terri Schiavo case.

Robert J Blendon1, John M Benson, Melissa J Herrmann.   

Abstract

An important question for physicians in the aftermath of the Terri Schiavo case is whether the effort of elected officials to intervene was a one-time anomaly or signals a future trend of elected officials being involved in cases where patients are in a vegetative or long-term comatose state. To try to answer this question, we used results from 12 national opinion surveys conducted in March and April 2005, when the Schiavo case was being debated. A review of these survey results showed that efforts by elected politicians to intervene in the Schiavo case were opposed by the majority of Americans. However, the public was more divided on the question of whether Schiavo's feeding tube should be removed. Opposition to removing Schiavo's feeding tube was associated with opposition to abortion. The results suggest that issues involved in cases like Schiavo's are not likely to disappear from the political agenda.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; In re Guardianship of Schiavo

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344413     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  2 in total

1.  Completion of advance directives among U.S. consumers.

Authors:  Jaya K Rao; Lynda A Anderson; Feng-Chang Lin; Jeffrey P Laux
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  From Memory to Attitude: The Neurocognitive Process beyond Euthanasia Acceptance.

Authors:  Martin Enke; Patric Meyer; Herta Flor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.