Literature DB >> 16343244

New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond.

R C Bast1, D Badgwell, Z Lu, R Marquez, D Rosen, J Liu, K A Baggerly, E N Atkinson, S Skates, Z Zhang, A Lokshin, U Menon, I Jacobs, K Lu.   

Abstract

A variety of biomarkers have been developed to monitor growth of ovarian cancer and to detect disease at an early interval. CA125 (MUC16) has provided a useful serum tumor marker for monitoring response to chemotherapy, detecting disease recurrence, distinguishing malignant from benign pelvic masses, and potentially improving clinical trial design. A rapid fall in CA125 during chemotherapy predicts a favorable prognosis and could be used to redistribute patients on multiarmed randomized clinical trials. Several studies now document that CA125 can serve as a surrogate marker for response in phase II trials. Serial measurement of CA125 might also provide a useful marker for monitoring stabilization of disease with cytostatic targeted therapeutic agents. The greatest potential for serum markers may be in detecting ovarian cancer at an early stage. A rising CA125 can be used to trigger transvaginal sonography (TVS) in a small fraction of patients. An algorithm has been developed that calculates risk of ovarian cancer based on serial CA125 values and refers patients at highest risk for TVS. Use of the algorithm is currently being evaluated in a trial with 200,000 women in the UK that will test critically the ability of a two-stage screening strategy to improve survival in ovarian cancer. Whatever the outcome, as 20% of ovarian cancers have little or no expression of CA125, additional serum markers will be required to detect all patients in an initial phase of screening. More than 30 serum markers have been evaluated alone and in combination with CA125 by different investigators. Some of the most promising include: HE4, mesothelin, M-CSF, osteopontin, kallikrein(s), and soluble EGF receptor. Two proteomic approaches have been used: one examines the pattern of peaks on mass spectroscopy and the other uses proteomic analysis to identify a limited number of critical markers that can be assayed by more conventional methods. Both approaches are promising and require further development. Several groups are placing markers on multiplex platforms to permit simultaneous assay of multiple markers with very small volumes of serum. Mathematical techniques are being developed to analyze combinations of marker levels to improve sensitivity and specificity. In the future, serum markers should improve the sensitivity of detecting recurrent disease as well as facilitate earlier detection of ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16343244     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00441.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  149 in total

1.  Novel monoclonal antibodies against the proximal (carboxy-terminal) portions of MUC16.

Authors:  Thapi Dharma Rao; Kay J Park; Peter Smith-Jones; Alexia Iasonos; Irina Linkov; Robert A Soslow; David R Spriggs
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Modern trends into the epidemiology and screening of ovarian cancer. Genetic substrate of the sporadic form.

Authors:  Maria Koutsaki; Apostolos Zaravinos; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 3.  Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.

Authors:  Brian M Nolen; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Role of HE4, CA72.4, and CA125 in monitoring ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Granato; Cecilia Midulla; Flavia Longo; Barbara Colaprisca; Luigi Frati; Emanuela Anastasi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-04-13

5.  Silencing of p130cas in ovarian carcinoma: a novel mechanism for tumor cell death.

Authors:  Alpa M Nick; Rebecca L Stone; Guillermo Armaiz-Pena; Bulent Ozpolat; Ibrahim Tekedereli; Whitney S Graybill; Charles N Landen; Gabriel Villares; Pablo Vivas-Mejia; Justin Bottsford-Miller; Hye Sun Kim; Ju-Seog Lee; Soo Mi Kim; Keith A Baggerly; Prahlad T Ram; Michael T Deavers; Robert L Coleman; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Serum levels of the ovarian cancer biomarker HE4 are decreased in pregnancy and increase with age.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; Michael Craig Miller; Elizabeth E Eklund; Karen H Lu; Robert C Bast; Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  N-linked glycan structures and their expressions change in the blood sera of ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  William R Alley; Jacqueline A Vasseur; John A Goetz; Martin Svoboda; Benjamin F Mann; Daniela E Matei; Nancy Menning; Ahmed Hussein; Yehia Mechref; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 8.  Mucins and toll-like receptors: kith and kin in infection and cancer.

Authors:  Shikha Tarang; Sushil Kumar; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  HE4, Ca125 and ROMA algorithm for differential diagnosis between benign gynaecological diseases and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Blanca Ortiz-Muñoz; Eduardo Aznar-Oroval; Ana García García; Amparo Covisa Peris; Pilar Perez Ballestero; Marina Sanchez Yepes; Tomás Garcia Lozano; Carmen Illueca Ballester; Enrique García Garcia
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-27

10.  Differential methylation profile of ovarian cancer in tissues and plasma.

Authors:  Anatoliy Melnikov; Denise Scholtens; Andrew Godwin; Victor Levenson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.