Literature DB >> 16342248

Detection of stool DNA mutations before and after treatment of colorectal neoplasia.

Sapna Syngal1, Elena Stoffel, Daniel Chung, Christopher Willett, David Schoetz, Paul Schroy, Deepa Jagadeesh, Kathleen Morel, Michael Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether stool DNA abnormalities arise solely from colorectal neoplastic lesions or are due to more pervasive field effects is not known. In the current study, the authors conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the performance of stool-based DNA testing in a large cohort and to examine whether the findings before treatment persist after surgical resection and/or adjuvant therapy.
METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed colorectal carcinoma or advanced adenomas (AA) provided stool samples before therapy, 1-3 months after surgical resection, and 6-9 months postresection. Stool samples were analyzed using the multi-target DNA assay panel (MTAP) consisting of 23 markers: 21 mutations in the p53, K-ras, and APC genes, a microsatellite instability marker (BAT-26), and the DNA integrity assay (DIA), a marker of loss of apoptosis.
RESULTS: Overall, 49 of 91 individuals (54%) tested positive with the MTAP test. The sensitivity of the MTAP test was 63% for invasive tumors compared with 26% for AA. Individuals whose lesions had a more advanced TNM stage or were located distal to the splenic flexure were significantly more likely to have a positive MTAP test. Of the 79 samples collected at 1-3 months after surgical resection of the neoplasm, 14 (18%) had a positive MTAP result, 12 of which were positive for DIA only. Of those collected at 6-9 months of follow-up, 5 of 72 (7%) tested positive on the MTAP panel.
CONCLUSIONS: Although many samples collected 1-3 months after surgical resection of the colorectal neoplasm tested positive on the MTAP, most were negative by 6-9 months, indicating that stool DNA abnormalities disappear after treatment of the neoplastic lesions. Surgery and chemoradiation appear to induce transient DIA abnormalities that may be independent of the presence of neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16342248     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  Screening options and recommendations for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M Geiger; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

Review 2.  KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program.

Authors:  J H J M van Krieken; A Jung; T Kirchner; F Carneiro; R Seruca; F T Bosman; P Quirke; J F Fléjou; T Plato Hansen; G de Hertogh; P Jares; C Langner; G Hoefler; M Ligtenberg; D Tiniakos; S Tejpar; G Bevilacqua; A Ensari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Stool methylated DNA markers decrease following colorectal cancer resection--implications for surveillance.

Authors:  John B Kisiel; Tracy C Yab; William R Taylor; Douglas W Mahoney; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Stool DNA testing for cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: an early view.

Authors:  John B Kisiel; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Fecal DNA-Based Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  D Kim Turgeon; Dean E Brenner
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2007-10

7.  Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke A Wilschut; Ann G Zauber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Detection of hypermethylated vimentin in urine of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin P Song; Surbhi Jain; Selena Y Lin; Quan Chen; Timothy M Block; Wei Song; Dean E Brenner; Ying-Hsiu Su
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 9.  Proteomic serum biomarkers and their potential application in cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Anouck Huijbers; Berit Velstra; Tim J A Dekker; Wilma E Mesker; Yuri E M van der Burgt; Bart J Mertens; André M Deelder; Rob A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of microRNA in Colorectal Cancer - a Comprehensive review.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Ido Mizrahi; Nadia Ilyayev; David Halle; Bjoern Brücher; Anton Bilchik; Mladjan Protic; Martin Daumer; Alexander Stojadinovic; Avital Itzhak; Aviram Nissan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.