Literature DB >> 1634024

Continuity of care: general practitioners' knowledge about, and sense of responsibility toward their patients.

P Hjortdahl1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the relations between continuity of care and the general practitioners' accumulated knowledge about their patients. A further objective was to evaluate the link between continuity of care and the doctors' sense of medical responsibility towards the patients. Emphasis was placed on the chronological, or longitudinal component of continuity of care. In a cross-sectional record study a representative sample of 133 Norwegian general practitioners each registered 30 consecutive consultations. Two aspects of longitudinal care were recorded: the duration of the patient-doctor relationship, measured as time from the first visit to the present, and the density, measured as the number of consultations (office or home visits) within the last 12 months. The physicians subjectively evaluated their accumulated knowledge about the patient's medical history, personality, and social network, on multinomic scales. Their sense of medical responsibility was indicated as one of three alternatives. Of 3990 possible recordings, 3918 (98%) were evaluated. In about one-third of all encounters the doctors reported extensive knowledge about their patients. It took at least one, and often 5 years, or at least 4-5 visits last year, to create such an extensive knowledge base. The physician's sense of responsibility increased more rapidly, and to a higher degree with the density of visits, than with duration of the relationship. The findings indicate firm links between longitudinal care and accumulated knowledge, and between longitudinal care and the doctors' sense of responsibility towards their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634024     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/9.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  33 in total

Review 1.  Continuity of hospital care: beyond the question of personal contact.

Authors:  Unni Krogstad; Dag Hofoss; Per Hjortdahl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-05

2.  Continuity of care--going out of style?

Authors:  P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.

Authors:  John W Saultz; Jennifer Lochner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Connected care in a fragmented world: lessons from rural health care.

Authors:  Jane Farmer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.

Authors:  Kate Sidaway-Lee; Denis Pereira Gray; Philip Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Continuity of care for older patients in family practice: how important is it?

Authors:  Graham Worrall; John Knight
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Primary care: core values. Core values in a changing world.

Authors:  I R McWhinney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

8.  Family practice: meanings for modern times.

Authors:  Amanda Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

Authors:  K E Kearley; G K Freeman; A Heath
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Primary prevention of first-ever stroke in primary health care: a clinical practice study based on medical register data in sweden.

Authors:  Ylva Skånér; Gunnar H Nilsson; Ingvar Krakau; Ejda Hassler; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.