OBJECTIVE: This article describes the development, administration, and reliability of the Cornell Services Index (CSI), a new instrument that measures health service use. The CSI was developed to create a standardized measure of the quantity and characteristics (for example, site and provider) of services used by adults. Descriptive data are provided to illustrate the application of the CSI in a community sample of adults who were newly admitted to outpatient mental health clinics. These data provide information about the pathways to care. METHODS: The interrater and test-retest reliability of the CSI were evaluated by using a sample of 40 adults who were seeking mental health treatment. Descriptive data on service use in a sample of 1,279 adults seeking care in outpatient mental health clinics was provided to demonstrate the application of the CSI. RESULTS: The CSI is a portable, easy to use, and brief assessment of service use. It has good interrater and test-retest reliability among adults without cognitive impairment. In the three months before seeking care, 31 percent of the adults interviewed had made a mental health visit, 36 percent had been hospitalized, and more than half (59 percent) had made a medical visit. Twenty-three percent of adults had sought care from a hospital's emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: The CSI is a reliable method to assess health service use for adults. The measure can extend assessment of use beyond the traditional mental health service use questions and provide a snapshot of service use patterns across types, providers, and sites of service among adults who seek mental health care.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the development, administration, and reliability of the Cornell Services Index (CSI), a new instrument that measures health service use. The CSI was developed to create a standardized measure of the quantity and characteristics (for example, site and provider) of services used by adults. Descriptive data are provided to illustrate the application of the CSI in a community sample of adults who were newly admitted to outpatient mental health clinics. These data provide information about the pathways to care. METHODS: The interrater and test-retest reliability of the CSI were evaluated by using a sample of 40 adults who were seeking mental health treatment. Descriptive data on service use in a sample of 1,279 adults seeking care in outpatient mental health clinics was provided to demonstrate the application of the CSI. RESULTS: The CSI is a portable, easy to use, and brief assessment of service use. It has good interrater and test-retest reliability among adults without cognitive impairment. In the three months before seeking care, 31 percent of the adults interviewed had made a mental health visit, 36 percent had been hospitalized, and more than half (59 percent) had made a medical visit. Twenty-three percent of adults had sought care from a hospital's emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: The CSI is a reliable method to assess health service use for adults. The measure can extend assessment of use beyond the traditional mental health service use questions and provide a snapshot of service use patterns across types, providers, and sites of service among adults who seek mental health care.
Authors: Patrick J Raue; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Samprit Banerjee; Amanda Artis; Maria Espejo; Idalia Catalan; Sara Romero Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Adam Simning; Thomas M Richardson; Bruce Friedman; Lisa L Boyle; Carol Podgorski; Yeates Conwell Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: A Parker Ruhl; Minxuan Huang; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Robert K Lord; Victor D Dinglas; Alexandra Chong; Kristin A Sepulveda; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Carl B Shanholtz; Donald M Steinwachs; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Claire Z Kalpakjian; Cheryl B McCullumsmith; Jesse R Fann; John S Richards; Brenda L Stoelb; Allen W Heinemann; Charles H Bombardier Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Yolonda R Pickett; Samiran Ghosh; Anne Rohs; Gary J Kennedy; Martha L Bruce; Jeffrey M Lyness Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 4.105