BACKGROUND: This study aimed to characterize healthcare and human services utilization among mentally distressed and non-distressed clients receiving in-home care management assessment by aging services provider network (ASPN) agencies in the U.S.A. METHODS: A two-hour research interview was administered to 378 English-speaking ASPN clients aged 60+ years in Monroe County, NY. A modified Cornell Services Index measured service utilization for the 90 days prior to the ASPN assessment. Clients with clinically significant anxiety or depressive symptoms were considered distressed. RESULTS: ASPN clients utilized a mean of 2.93 healthcare and 1.54 human services. The 42% of subjects who were distressed accessed more healthcare services (e.g. mental health, intensive medical services) and had more outpatient visits and days hospitalized than the non-distressed group. Contrary to expectations, distressed clients did not receive more human services. Among those who were distressed, over half had discussed their mental health with a medical professional in the past year, and half were currently taking a medication for their emotional state. A far smaller proportion had seen a mental health professional. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S.A., aging services providers serve a population with high medical illness burden and medical service utilization. Many clients also suffer from anxiety and depression, which they often have discussed with a medical professional and for which they are receiving medications. Few, however, have seen a mental health specialist preceding intake by the ASPN agency. Optimal care for this vulnerable, service intensive group would integrate primary medical and mental healthcare with delivery of community-based social services for older adults.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to characterize healthcare and human services utilization among mentally distressed and non-distressed clients receiving in-home care management assessment by aging services provider network (ASPN) agencies in the U.S.A. METHODS: A two-hour research interview was administered to 378 English-speaking ASPN clients aged 60+ years in Monroe County, NY. A modified Cornell Services Index measured service utilization for the 90 days prior to the ASPN assessment. Clients with clinically significant anxiety or depressive symptoms were considered distressed. RESULTS:ASPN clients utilized a mean of 2.93 healthcare and 1.54 human services. The 42% of subjects who were distressed accessed more healthcare services (e.g. mental health, intensive medical services) and had more outpatient visits and days hospitalized than the non-distressed group. Contrary to expectations, distressed clients did not receive more human services. Among those who were distressed, over half had discussed their mental health with a medical professional in the past year, and half were currently taking a medication for their emotional state. A far smaller proportion had seen a mental health professional. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S.A., aging services providers serve a population with high medical illness burden and medical service utilization. Many clients also suffer from anxiety and depression, which they often have discussed with a medical professional and for which they are receiving medications. Few, however, have seen a mental health specialist preceding intake by the ASPN agency. Optimal care for this vulnerable, service intensive group would integrate primary medical and mental healthcare with delivery of community-based social services for older adults.
Authors: M P Luber; B S Meyers; P G Williams-Russo; J P Hollenberg; T N DiDomenico; M E Charlson; G S Alexopoulos Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Lesley E Steinman; John T Frederick; Thomas Prohaska; William A Satariano; Sharon Dornberg-Lee; Rita Fisher; Pearl Beth Graub; Katherine Leith; Kay Presby; Joseph Sharkey; Susan Snyder; David Turner; Nancy Wilson; Lisa Yagoda; Jurgen Unutzer; Mark Snowden Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Ellen L Brown; Patrick J Raue; Amy E Mlodzianowski; Barnett S Meyers; Andrew C Leon; Moonseong Heo; Amy L Byers; Rebecca L Greenberg; Susan Rinder; Wendy Katt; Pamela Nassisi Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amber M Gum; Andrew Petkus; Sarah J McDougal; Melanie Present; Bellinda King-Kallimanis; Lawrence Schonfeld Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Jurgen Unutzer; Wayne J Katon; Ming-Yu Fan; Michael C Schoenbaum; Elizabeth H B Lin; Richard D Della Penna; Diane Powers Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Joung T Huh; Christopher M Weaver; Jennifer L Martin; Nicholas H Caskey; Alisa O'Riley; Betty Josea Kramer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yeates Conwell; Adam Simning; Nicole Driffill; Yinglin Xia; Xin Tu; Susan P Messing; David Oslin Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Kimberly A Van Orden; Alisa A O'Riley; Adam Simning; Carol Podgorski; Thomas M Richardson; Yeates Conwell Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2014-04-08
Authors: Adam Simning; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Susan G Fisher; Thomas M Richardson; Yeates Conwell Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Mario Ulises Pérez-Zepeda; Victoria Eugenia Arango-Lopera; Fernando A Wagner; Joseph J Gallo; Sergio Sánchez-García; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; Carmen García-Peña Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-14 Impact factor: 3.485