Literature DB >> 16339094

Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout.

Michael A Becker1, H Ralph Schumacher, Robert L Wortmann, Patricia A MacDonald, Denise Eustace, William A Palo, Janet Streit, Nancy Joseph-Ridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, is a potential alternative to allopurinol for patients with hyperuricemia and gout.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 762 patients with gout and with serum urate concentrations of at least 8.0 mg per deciliter (480 micromol per liter) to receive either febuxostat (80 mg or 120 mg) or allopurinol (300 mg) once daily for 52 weeks; 760 received the study drug. Prophylaxis against gout flares with naproxen or colchicine was provided during weeks 1 through 8. The primary end point was a serum urate concentration of less than 6.0 mg per deciliter (360 micromol per liter) at the last three monthly measurements. The secondary end points included reduction in the incidence of gout flares and in tophus area.
RESULTS: The primary end point was reached in 53 percent of patients receiving 80 mg of febuxostat, 62 percent of those receiving 120 mg of febuxostat, and 21 percent of those receiving allopurinol (P<0.001 for the comparison of each febuxostat group with the allopurinol group). Although the incidence of gout flares diminished with continued treatment, the overall incidence during weeks 9 through 52 was similar in all groups: 64 percent of patients receiving 80 mg of febuxostat, 70 percent of those receiving 120 mg of febuxostat, and 64 percent of those receiving allopurinol (P=0.99 for 80 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol; P=0.23 for 120 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol). The median reduction in tophus area was 83 percent in patients receiving 80 mg of febuxostat and 66 percent in those receiving 120 mg of febuxostat, as compared with 50 percent in those receiving allopurinol (P=0.08 for 80 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol; P=0.16 for 120 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol). More patients in the high-dose febuxostat group than in the allopurinol group (P=0.003) or the low-dose febuxostat group discontinued the study. Four of the 507 patients in the two febuxostat groups (0.8 percent) and none of the 253 patients in the allopurinol group died; all deaths were from causes that the investigators (while still blinded to treatment) judged to be unrelated to the study drugs (P=0.31 for the comparison between the combined febuxostat groups and the allopurinol group).
CONCLUSIONS: Febuxostat, at a daily dose of 80 mg or 120 mg, was more effective than allopurinol at the commonly used fixed daily dose of 300 mg in lowering serum urate. Similar reductions in gout flares and tophus area occurred in all treatment groups. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16339094     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa050373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  312 in total

1.  [Allopurinol-induced hypersensitivity syndrome resulting in death].

Authors:  Sören Laurisch; Maren Jaedtke; Reyhan Demir; Sajoscha A Sorrentino; Jan T Kielstein; Hans-Oliver Rennekampff; Peter M Vogt; Gerd P Meyer; Martin Fuchs; Gunnar Klein; Hartmut Drexler; Bernhard Schieffer; L Christian Napp
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Are either or both hyperuricemia and xanthine oxidase directly toxic to the vasculature? A critical appraisal.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Jacob George; Sushma Rekhraj; Allan D Struthers; Hyon Choi; Robert A Terkeltaub
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  International position paper on febuxostat.

Authors:  Tim L Jansen; Pascal Richette; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Philip-André Guerne; Leonardo Punzi; Burkhard Leeb; Victoria Barskova; Till Uhlig; José Pimentão; Irena Zimmermann-Górska; Elisio Pascual; Thomas Bardin; Michael Doherty
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Uric acid: the past decade.

Authors:  Diana Rudan; Ozren Polasek; Ivana Kolcić; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  The next generation of gout therapeutics: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Aryeh M Abeles; Michael H Pillinger
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Quality of care in patients with gout: why is management suboptimal and what can be done about it?

Authors:  N Lawrence Edwards
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Expression and function of CXCL16 in a novel model of gout.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Ruth; Monica D Arendt; M Asif Amin; Salahuddin Ahmed; Hubert Marotte; Bradley J Rabquer; Charles Lesch; Solhee Lee; Alisa E Koch
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lesinurad/Allopurinol Versus Febuxostat for the Management of Gout/Hyperuricemia in Italy.

Authors:  M Ruggeri; M Basile; C Drago; F R Rolli; A Cicchetti
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Febuxostat.

Authors:  Bishoy Kamel; Garry G Graham; Kenneth M Williams; Kevin D Pile; Richard O Day
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Treatment Options for Gout.

Authors:  Bettina Engel; Johannes Just; Markus Bleckwenn; Klaus Weckbecker
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.