Literature DB >> 16338565

Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia.

Nayyirih G Tahzib1, Sander J Bootsma, Fred A G J Eggink, Vaishali A Nabar, Rudy M M A Nuijts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine subjective patient satisfaction and self-perceived quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
METHODS: A validated questionnaire consisting of 66 items was self-administered by 142 consecutive patients. Seven scales covering a specific aspect of quality of vision were formulated. Aspects included global satisfaction, quality of uncorrected and corrected vision, quality of night vision, glare, daytime driving, and night driving. Main outcome measures were responses to individual questions and scale scores, and correlations with clinical parameters including refractive outcome, uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, ablation depth, and scotopic pupil-optical zone disparity were obtained.
RESULTS: The mean score for the overall satisfaction was 4.1 +/- 0.71 (SD) (scale 0 to 5.0). A total of 92.2% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery, 93.6% considered their main goal of surgery achieved, and 92.3% would choose to have LASIK surgery again. Satisfaction with uncorrected vision was 3.03 +/- 0.71. The mean score for glare was 3.0 +/- 0.9. At night, glare from lights was believed to be more important than before surgery by 47.2%. Glare from oncoming car headlights after surgery was reported by 58.4% and was believed to be more bothersome for night driving than before surgery by 52.8%. Night driving was rated more difficult than before surgery by 39.4%, whereas 59.3% had less difficulty driving at night. There was a significant correlation between the uncorrected vision score and the postoperative spherical equivalent (r = 0.245) and postoperative astigmatism (r = 0.265). There was no correlation between the glare or night vision scores and the degree of correction, the amount of ablation depth, or the disparity between the scotopic pupil and the optical zone.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-perceived uncorrected vision after LASIK surgery for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism appears to be very good and is related to the postoperative residual error. Although the majority of patients postoperatively experienced glare, particularly with driving at night, this was not related to the pupil-optical zone disparity or degree of correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  14 in total

1.  [Wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK: first results].

Authors:  J Bühren; A Strenger; T Martin; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Quantitative evaluation of night vision and correlation of refractive and topographical parameters with glare after orthokeratology.

Authors:  Takashi Kojima; Asato Hasegawa; Syuya Hara; Rie Horai; Yoko Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakamura; Murat Dogru; Kazuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Visual improvement by aberration-free excimer laser retreatment : Therapy after combined photorefractive keratectomy and keratome laser in situ keratomileusis treatment].

Authors:  M Böhm; C Gruber; E Hemkeppler; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  3-Year follow-up after Lasik: assessing the risk factors for retreatment.

Authors:  Jorge E Valdez-García; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Rosa Martínez-Muñoz
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Edward E Manche; Weldon W Haw
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

Review 6.  Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they?

Authors:  D Korolija; S Wood-Dauphinee; R Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Analysis of the visual and refractive outcome following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment over a four-year follow-up period.

Authors:  Ayman Saeed; Maeve O'Doherty; John O'Doherty; Michael O'Keefe
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 2.029

8.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Mahfouth A Bamashmus; Khammash Hubaish; Mohammed Alawad; Hisham Alakhlee
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

9.  Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer.

Authors:  Sarah Moussa; Alois K Dexl; Eva M Krall; Eva M Arlt; Günther Grabner; Josef Ruckhofer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-12

10.  Satisfaction level of physicians who have undergone corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Lee; Ji-Won Kwon; Joon Young Hyon; Young Keun Han
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.