Literature DB >> 16338101

Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: the role of proximity to the goal.

V D Chamizo1, R D Manteiga, T Rodrigo, N J Mackintosh.   

Abstract

In two experiments, rats were trained to find a hidden platform in a Morris pool in the presence of two landmarks. Landmark B was present on all training trials, on half the trials accompanied by landmark A, on the remainder by landmark C. For rats in Group Bn, B was near the location of the platform; for those in Group Bf, B was far from the platform. Group Bn performed better than Group Bf on test trials to B alone, but significantly worse on test trials to a new configuration formed by A and C. Thus, the spatial proximity of B to the platform affected not only how well it could be used to locate the platform, but also its ability to prevent learning about other landmarks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338101     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  10 in total

Review 1.  Does terrain slope really dominate goal searching?

Authors:  Daniele Nardi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

2.  Associative Basis of Landmark Learning and Integration in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009-01-01

3.  Spatial integration with rats.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; T Rodrigo; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Temporal and spatial contiguity are necessary for competition between events.

Authors:  Estibaliz Herrera; José A Alcalá; Toru Tazumi; Matthew G Buckley; José Prados; Gonzalo P Urcelay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Temporal memory averaging and post-encoding alterations in temporal expectation.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; Alexandra M Henning
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Dorsolateral striatal lesions impair navigation based on landmark-goal vectors but facilitate spatial learning based on a "cognitive map".

Authors:  Yutaka Kosaki; Steven L Poulter; Joe M Austen; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Understanding the role of distance, direction and cue salience in an associative model of landmark learning.

Authors:  Sean Commins; Dirk Fey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Blocking spatial navigation across environments that have a different shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.478

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.