Literature DB >> 16337690

Generic effectiveness measures: sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders.

Sarah J Perini1, Tim Slade, Gavin Andrews.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a newly developed screening measure of disability, the WHODAS II, to three established generic effectiveness measures in terms of its sensitivity to symptom change in people with anxiety disorders.
METHOD: Patients who had undergone treatment for social phobia or panic disorder/agoraphobia at an anxiety disorders clinic were administered generic effectiveness measures and symptom measures before and after treatment. The design was naturalistic and observational. Data analysis included correlations between generic effectiveness and symptom measures; and effect size calculations regarding the ability of each generic effectiveness measure to discriminate between patients whose symptoms improved and patients whose symptoms did not improve over the course of treatment.
RESULTS: The WHODAS II was consistently the most sensitive generic effectiveness measure in its capacity to detect symptom changes in patients with social phobia. The SF-12 and K-10 also showed moderate sensitivity to symptom change. In the sample of patients with panic disorder/agoraphobia, the SF-12 was the most sensitive measure overall, closely followed by the K-10 and WHODAS II. The NCS Disability Days were the least sensitive to symptom change in both samples.
CONCLUSION: The WHODAS II is at least as sensitive as other generic effectiveness measures to anxiety symptom changes, and is particularly sensitive to changes in social anxiety symptoms. It may prove to be a valuable measurement tool for informing public health policy in relation to anxiety disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337690     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  8 in total

1.  Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

Authors:  T Bedirhan Ustün; Somnath Chatterji; Nenad Kostanjsek; Jürgen Rehm; Cille Kennedy; Joanne Epping-Jordan; Shekhar Saxena; Michael von Korff; Charles Pull
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Clinical use of the Kessler psychological distress scales with culturally diverse groups.

Authors:  Yvonne Stolk; Ida Kaplan; Josef Szwarc
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Modeling the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II using non-parametric item response models.

Authors:  Francisca Galindo-Garre; María Dolores Hidalgo; Georgina Guilera; Oscar Pino; J Emilio Rojo; Juana Gómez-Benito
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Measuring functional disability in children with developmental disorders in low-resource settings: validation of Developmental Disorders-Children Disability Assessment Schedule (DD-CDAS) in rural Pakistan.

Authors:  Syed Usman Hamdani; Zill-E Huma; Lawrence Wissow; Atif Rahman; Melissa Gladstone
Journal:  Glob Ment Health (Camb)       Date:  2020-07-13

5.  Modified WHODAS-II provides valid measure of global disability but filter items increased skewness.

Authors:  Michael Von Korff; Paul K Crane; Jordi Alonso; Gemma Vilagut; Matthias C Angermeyer; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; Oye Gureje; Ron de Graaf; Yueqin Huang; Noboru Iwata; Elie G Karam; Viviane Kovess; Carmen Lara; Daphna Levinson; José Posada-Villa; Kate M Scott; Johan Ormel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Assessing Functioning across Common Mental Disorders in Psychiatric Emergency Patients: Results from the WHODAS-2.

Authors:  A Hoehne; C-E Giguère; C M Herba; R Labelle
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 5.321

7.  Analysis of the psychological impact of a vascular risk factor intervention: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Suzanne Helen McKenzie; Upali W Jayasinghe; Mahnaz Fanaian; Megan Passey; Mark Fort Harris
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Measuring disability across cultures--the psychometric properties of the WHODAS II in older people from seven low- and middle-income countries. The 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey.

Authors:  Renata M Sousa; Michael E Dewey; Daisy Acosta; A T Jotheeswaran; Erico Castro-Costa; Cleusa P Ferri; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; Juana Guillermina Rodriguez Pichardo; Nayeli Garcia Ramírez; Juan Llibre Rodriguez; Marina Calvo Rodriguez; Aquiles Salas; Ana Luisa Sosa; Joseph Williams; Martin J Prince
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.035

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.