Literature DB >> 16337253

"Bothersome blur": a functional unit of blur perception.

Kenneth J Ciuffreda1, Arkady Selenow, Bin Wang, Balamurali Vasudevan, George Zikos, Steven R Ali.   

Abstract

Knowledge regarding the amount of blur perceived to be "bothersome" to an individual, namely that which is assumed to be annoying and to adversely affect task performance, remains limited. A Badal optical system was used to measure the blur detection, bothersome blur, and non-resolvable blur dioptric thresholds monocularly either to an isolated 20/50 or 20/200 Snellen E, or to three 20/50 lines of text. Subjects were comprised of 13 visually normal young adults and 3 absolute presbyopes. Cycloplegia was used to paralyze accommodation in the young adults. Within each target type for the young adults, the mean bothersome blur threshold was always significantly larger than that found for blur detection and significantly smaller than that found for non-resolvable blur. Across target types and blur criteria, the bothersome blur thresholds for the isolated 20/50 E (1.02 D) and the 20/50 text (1.34 D) were not significantly different, although in 12 of the 13 subjects the latter were larger (p<0.002, sign test). However, both were significantly smaller than for the isolated 20/200 E (1.80 D). In a subset of young adult subjects, bothersome blur was found to be repeatable over time. The results were similar in the absolute presbyopes. The bothersome blur threshold was primarily influenced by target detail and secondarily by target extent. These findings have important implications with respect to tolerances for optical lens design and refractive surgery outcomes, as well as provide insight into basic aspects of human blur perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337253     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  A relationship between tolerance of blur and personality.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; C Randall Colvin; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Accommodative Gain in Relation to Perceived Target Clarity.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Anatomical and Visual Outcomes after LASIK Performed in Myopic Eyes with the WaveLight® Refractive Suite (Alcon® Laboratories Inc., USA).

Authors:  Imene Salah-Mabed; Sarah Moran; Emmanuelle Perez; Guillaume Debellemanière; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Perceived blur in naturally contoured images depends on phase.

Authors:  Stephanie Murray; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-02

7.  The perception and misperception of optical defocus, shading, and shape.

Authors:  Scott Wj Mooney; Phillip J Marlow; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The effect of refractive surgery on blur thresholds.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Hadiya Farhath Pattan; Mehal Rathore; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Prema Padmanabhan; Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study.

Authors:  Balamurali Vasudevan; Kaiser Sultani; Christopher Cossette; Brandon Burr
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-12-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.