Literature DB >> 16336550

Assessing quality of diabetes care by measuring longitudinal changes in hemoglobin A1c in the Veterans Health Administration.

Wes Thompson1, Hongwei Wang, Minge Xie, John Kolassa, Mangala Rajan, Chin-Lin Tseng, Stephen Crystal, Quanwu Zhang, Yehuda Vardi, Leonard Pogach, Monika M Safford.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A1c levels are widely used to assess quality of diabetes care provided by health care systems. Currently, cross-sectional measures are commonly used for such assessments.
OBJECTIVE: To study within-patient longitudinal changes in A1c levels at Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities as an alternative to cross-sectional measures of quality of diabetes care.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study using institutional data on individual patient A1c level over time (October 1, 1998-September 30, 2000) with time variant and invariant covariates.
SETTING: One hundred and twenty-five VHA facilities nationwide, October 1, 1998-September 30, 2000. PATIENTS: Diabetic veteran users with A1c measurement performed using National Glycosylated Hemoglobin Standardization Project certified A1c lab assay methods. EXPOSURES: Characteristics unlikely to reflect quality of care, but known to influence A1c levels, demographics, and baseline illness severity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Monthly change in A1c for average patient cared for at each facility.
RESULTS: The preponderance of facilities showed monthly declines in within-patient A1c over the study period (mean change of -0.0148 A1c units per month, range -0.074 to 0.042). Individual facilities varied in their monthly change, with 105 facilities showing monthly declines (70 significant at .05 level) and 20 showing monthly increases (5 significant at .05 level). Case-mix adjustment resulted in modest changes (mean change of -0.0131 case-mix adjusted A1c units per month, range -0.079 to 0.043). Facilities were ranked from worst to best, with attached 90 percent confidence intervals. Among the bottom 10 ranked facilities, four remained within the bottom decile with 90 percent confidence.
CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in facility-level longitudinal changes in A1c levels. We propose that evaluation of change in A1c levels over time can be used as a new measure to reflect quality of care provided to populations of individuals with chronic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16336550      PMCID: PMC1361232          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00439.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Jonathan B Perlin; Kenneth W Kizer; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparing clinical automated, medical record, and hybrid data sources for diabetes quality measures.

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Dylan M Smith; Mary M Hogan; Sarah L Krein; Leonard Pogach; Timothy P Hofer; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2002-10

3.  Quality of diabetes care in community health centers.

Authors:  M H Chin; S B Auerbach; S Cook; J F Harrison; J Koppert; L Jin; F Thiel; T G Karrison; A G Harrand; C T Schaefer; H T Takashima; N Egbert; S C Chiu; W L McNabb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57).

Authors:  Alex Wright; A C Felix Burden; Richard B Paisey; Carole A Cull; Rury R Holman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Identifying persons with diabetes using Medicare claims data.

Authors:  P L Hebert; L S Geiss; E F Tierney; M M Engelgau; B P Yawn; A M McBean
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Performance status of health care facilities changes with risk adjustment of HbA1c.

Authors:  Q Zhang; M Safford; J Ottenweller; G Hawley; D Repke; J F Burgess; S Dhar; H Cheng; H Naito; L M Pogach
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: a five-year progress report.

Authors:  R R Little; C L Rohlfing; H M Wiedmeyer; G L Myers; D B Sacks; D E Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Disparities in use of lipid-lowering medications among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Monika Safford; Laura Eaton; Gerald Hawley; Michael Brimacombe; Mangala Rajan; Huiling Li; Leonard Pogach
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-28

10.  Cross-sectional versus longitudinal performance assessments in the management of diabetes.

Authors:  Mark Weiner; Judith Long
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Behavior matters.

Authors:  Edwin B Fisher; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Russell E Glasgow; Debra Haire-Joshu; Laura L Hayman; Robert M Kaplan; Marilyn S Nanney; Judith K Ockene
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Pharmacoepidemiology of insulin initiation in diabetes care.

Authors:  Leonard M Pogach
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Quality indicators and performance measures in diabetes care.

Authors:  David C Aron
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Racial differences in spatial patterns for poor glycemic control in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Rebekah J Walker; Brian Neelon; Melanie Davis; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Longitudinal approaches to evaluate health care quality and outcomes: the Veterans Health Administration diabetes epidemiology cohorts.

Authors:  Donald R Miller; Leonard Pogach
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01

6.  Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Rodney A Hayward; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography have multiple uncontrolled coronary artery disease risk factors and high risk for cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Dustin M Boatman; Bilal Saeed; Indu Varghese; Calvin T Peters; Jad Daye; Aman Haider; Michele Roesle; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Factors influencing disease self-management among veterans with diabetes and poor glycemic control.

Authors:  Karin M Nelson; Lynne McFarland; Gayle Reiber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  No consistent association between processes-of-care and health-related quality of life among patients with diabetes: a missing link?

Authors:  Alejandra Casillas; Katia Iglesias; Aline Flatz; Bernard Burnand; Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2015-01-10

10.  Chronic illness with complexity: implications for performance measurement of optimal glycemic control.

Authors:  Pramod Meduru; Drew Helmer; Mangala Rajan; Chin-Lin Tseng; Leonard Pogach; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.128

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.