Literature DB >> 16333609

Coronal oblique turbo STIR imaging of the sacrum and sacroiliac joints at routine MR imaging of the lumbar spine.

Tadhg G Gleeson1, Martin J O'Connell, Deirdre Duke, Martin Ryan, Rachel Ennis, Stephen J Eustace.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical impact of coronal oblique imaging of the lumbrosacral junction and the sacrum at initial presentation for MR imaging of the lumbar spine in patients presenting with low back pain or sciatic pain. Two hundred and sixty consecutive patients attending for MRI of the lumbar spine underwent simultaneous coronal oblique turbo short tau inversion recovery (STIR; TR 2500, TE 40, TI 150, echo train length 7, number of scan acquisitions 2) imaging of the sacrum and the sacroiliac joints with a field of view of 30-cm and 3-mm slices (acquisition time 3 min and 20 s). Images were reviewed by two experienced radiologists to determine the cause of back pain, with and without images of the sacrum and sacroiliac joints. The added value of the additional sequence was assessed. Correlation was made with surgery, response to nerve root injection or clinical follow-up at 3 months. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if patient stratification according to sex or symptoms would be useful. In total, in 19 of 260 patients (7.3%), abnormalities were identified at coronal STIR imaging. In 7 of 260 patients (2.7%), pathology was identified in the sacrum thought to account for back pain, altering the diagnosis made on the standard sequences. These diagnoses were sacroiliitis (n=2), sacral stress fracture (n=1), degenerative sacroiliac joints (n=1), degenerative accessory articulation between the lumbar spine and the sacrum (n=1), Tarlov cyst of nerve root (n=1) and retroverted uterus causing sciatic pain (n=1). Patient stratification according to sex or the presence or absence of sciatic symptoms was not useful in predicting the added benefit of the additional sequence. Routine coronal STIR imaging of the sacrum as part of lumbar spine MRI improves assessment of patients presenting with low back pain or sciatica in only a small number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16333609     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-005-0440-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  15 in total

1.  The diagnosis of herniated intervertebral disks with MR imaging: a comparison of gradient-refocused-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  S Murayama; Y Numaguchi; A E Robinson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Evaluation of the patient with low back pain.

Authors:  O Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Sciatic neuropathy secondary to a uterine fibroid: a case report.

Authors:  M P Bodack; J C Cole; W Nagler
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 4.  Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; J Beltran; G Johnson; J Rousseau; X Marchandise; A Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Pelvic osteosarcomas causing lumbosacral nerve root compression presenting as herniated intervertebral disc: report of two cases.

Authors:  E Beşkonakli; S R Cayli; O Okay; U Bostanci; R Ergün
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of diffuse bone marrow disease.

Authors:  R M Steiner; D G Mitchell; V M Rao; M E Schweitzer
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 7.  Neuroimaging in low back pain.

Authors:  S Craig Humphreys; Jason C Eck; Scott D Hodges
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.292

8.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.

Authors:  D L Kent; D R Haynor; E B Larson; R A Deyo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  HLA B27 in health and disease: a double-edged sword?

Authors:  P Bowness
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  6 in total

1.  Global incidence of spinal perineural Tarlov's cysts and their morphological characteristics: a meta-analysis of 13,266 subjects.

Authors:  Tomasz Klepinowski; Wojciech Orbik; Leszek Sagan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  A systematic critical review on MRI in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Bodil Arnbak; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Tue Secher Jensen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.156

3.  Sacroiliac indicis increase the specificity of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis.

Authors:  Zehra Pınar Koç; Arzu Kin Cengiz; Funda Aydın; Nehir Samancı; Veli Yazısız; Süleyman Serdar Koca; Binnur Karayalçın
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2015-02-05

4.  Additional merit of coronal STIR imaging for MR imaging of lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ranjana Gupta; Puneet Mittal; Amit Mittal; Kapish Mittal; Sharad Gupta; Ravleen Kaur
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Clinical impact of coronal-STIR sequence in a routine lumbar spine MR imaging protocol to investigate low back pain.

Authors:  Valeria Romeo; Carlo Cavaliere; Carmine Sorrentino; Andrea Ponsiglione; Lorenzo Ugga; Luigi Barbuto; Francesco Verde; Mario Covello
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Added value of coronal-T1W sequence to the lumbar MR imaging protocol for low back pain.

Authors:  Ahmet Nedim Kahraman; Ahmet Vural
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 1.173

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.