Literature DB >> 16332619

The role of sampling in mycotoxin contamination: an holistic view.

M Miraglia1, B De Santis, V Minardi, F Debegnach, C Brera.   

Abstract

The need to obtain a representative sample deserves particular consideration since a wrong sampling plan can greatly affect the reliability of the measured levels of mycotoxins. This can even result in legal disputes and barriers to trade. Reported here is an holistic view for an ideal sampling plan, which is based on two consecutive steps: (i) To establish 'why, where and when' sampling has to be performed by assessing the purpose, the appropriate time and the site for collecting the samples; (ii) To establish 'how' to draw samples by assessing practical ad hoc guidelines, considering that, for bulk goods in particular, mycotoxins are not at all homogeneously distributed in a lot. So far, step 1 is not yet covered by specific guidelines while for step 2, European regulations establish the procedures for the sampling of bulk and retail products potentially contaminated by mycotoxins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332619     DOI: 10.1080/02652030500389055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Addit Contam        ISSN: 0265-203X


  9 in total

1.  Usefulness of the analytical control of aflatoxins in feedstuffs for dairy cows for the prevention of aflatoxin M1 in milk.

Authors:  M Rodríguez-Blanco; A J Ramos; M Prim; V Sanchis; S Marín
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 2.  Sampling of cereals and cereal-based foods for the determination of ochratoxin A: an overview.

Authors:  S A Tittlemier; E Varga; P M Scott; R Krska
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2011-06

Review 3.  Real and perceived risks for mycotoxin contamination in foods and feeds: challenges for food safety control.

Authors:  Dragan R Milićević; Marija Skrinjar; Tatjana Baltić
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and Fusarium graminearum contamination of cereal straw; field distribution; and sampling of big bales.

Authors:  P Häggblom; E Nordkvist
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 5.  Review on Mycotoxin Issues in Ruminants: Occurrence in Forages, Effects of Mycotoxin Ingestion on Health Status and Animal Performance and Practical Strategies to Counteract Their Negative Effects.

Authors:  Antonio Gallo; Gianluca Giuberti; Jens C Frisvad; Terenzio Bertuzzi; Kristian F Nielsen
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Comparison of the efficiency between two sampling plans for aflatoxins analysis in maize.

Authors:  Adriano Olnei Mallmann; Alexandro Marchioro; Maurício Schneider Oliveira; Ricardo Hummes Rauber; Paulo Dilkin; Carlos Augusto Mallmann
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  Current challenges in the diagnosis of zearalenone toxicosis as illustrated by a field case of hyperestrogenism in suckling piglets.

Authors:  Isabel Hennig-Pauka; Franz-Josef Koch; Simone Schaumberger; Bettina Woechtl; Johannes Novak; Michael Sulyok; Veronika Nagl
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-09-12

8.  Impact of Chronic Levels of Naturally Multi-Contaminated Feed with Fusarium Mycotoxins on Broiler Chickens and Evaluation of the Mitigation Properties of Different Titers of Yeast Cell Wall Extract.

Authors:  Alexandra C Weaver; W D King; Morgan Verax; Ursula Fox; Manoj B Kudupoje; Greg Mathis; Brett Lumpkins; Alexandros Yiannikouris
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 9.  The Existing Methods and Novel Approaches in Mycotoxins' Detection.

Authors:  Edyta Janik; Marcin Niemcewicz; Marcin Podogrocki; Michal Ceremuga; Leslaw Gorniak; Maksymilian Stela; Michal Bijak
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.