Literature DB >> 16331533

Human embryo cloning prohibited in Hong Kong.

Athena Liu1.   

Abstract

Since the birth of Dolly (the cloned sheep) in 1997, debates have arisen on the ethical and legal questions of cloning-for-biomedical-research (more commonly termed "therapeutic cloning") and of reproductive cloning using human gametes. Hong Kong enacted the Human Reproductive Technology Ordinance (Cap 561) in 2000. Section 15(1)(e) of this Ordinance prohibits the "replacing of the nucleus of a cell of an embryo with a nucleus taken from any other cell," i.e., nucleus substitution. Section 15(1)(f) prohibits the cloning of any embryo. The scope of the latter, therefore, is arguably the widest, prohibiting all cloning techniques such as cell nucleus replacement, embryo splitting, parthenogenesis, and cloning using stem cell lines. Although the Human Reproductive Technology Ordinance is not yet fully operative, this article examines how these prohibitions may adversely impact on basic research and the vision of the Hong Kong scientific community. It concludes that in light of recent scientific developments, it is time to review if the law offers a coherent set of policies in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331533      PMCID: PMC3455156          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-005-4873-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  10 in total

1.  The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Patrick A Molinari
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  1998-12

2.  The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine: an appraisal of the Council of Europe Convention.

Authors:  Henriette D C Roscam Abbing
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  1998-12

3.  Reproductive cloning: can cloning harm the clone?

Authors:  Shaun D Pattinson
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  Beyond the HFE Act of 1990: the regulation of stem cell research in the UK.

Authors:  Aurora Plomer
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly.

Authors:  Catherine Stanton; John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Human cloning and the challenge of regulation.

Authors:  J A Robertson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Why we should ban human cloning.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle.

Authors:  Derek Morgan; Mary Ford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world.

Authors:  Shaun D Pattinson; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.