Literature DB >> 15574436

Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle.

Derek Morgan1, Mary Ford.   

Abstract

Reproductive cloning has thrown up new scientific possibilities, ethical conundrums, and legal challenges. An initial question, considered by the English courts in 2003, was whether the technique presently available, that of cell nucleus replacement, falls outside the provisions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. If it does, the creation and use, including use in research protocols, of human embryos would be unregulated, disclosing a need to consider remedial legislation. The resolution by the courts of this legal question dramatically engages them in a resolution of fundamental ethical dilemmas, and discloses the possibilities and limitation of negotiating science policy through the processes of litigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (Great Britain); Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574436      PMCID: PMC1733962          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.004085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.

Authors:  Roger Brownsword
Journal:  Mod Law Rev       Date:  2002-07
  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Human embryo cloning prohibited in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Athena Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.