Literature DB >> 16331010

Cementless two-staged total hip arthroplasty for deep periprosthetic infection.

Matthew J Kraay1, Victor M Goldberg, Steven J Fitzgerald, Michael J Salata.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: bTwo-staged exchange with delayed reimplantation of a new prosthesis is considered by many to be the preferred method of treatment for deep periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty. Until recently, most authors of previously published reports of this two-staged exchange procedure have used cemented implants fixed with antibiotic-containing bone cement. In view of the superior results of revision total hip arthroplasties with cementless implants, we reviewed the results of 33 two-staged revision total hip arthroplasties done for deep infection using cementless femoral components. There were no recurrent infections in the 28 patients in this study who had a 2-year minimum followup. Two patients developed a new infection with a different organism after reimplantation of their hip. Three patients with considerable acetabular bone deficiency had acetabular component revision for aseptic loosening; however, there were no cases of femoral component loosening. The overall infection rate of 7% using this approach was comparable to previous reports of two-staged revision total hip arthroplasties done with cemented components fixed with antibiotic-containing bone cement. In addition, cementless femoral component fixation seemed to be more reliable and durable in comparison to previous reports of revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented stems. The results of this study support the continued use of cementless implant fixation for two-staged reconstruction of the infected total hip arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV-1 (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331010     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194312.97098.0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

Review 1.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Hip joint infections - Results of a questionnaire among 28 university orthopedic departments].

Authors:  K Anagnostakos; D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jaiben George; Grzegorz Kwiecien; Alison K Klika; Deepak Ramanathan; Thomas W Bauer; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Two-stage revision of prosthetic hip joint infections using antibiotic-loaded cement spacers: When is the best time to perform the second stage?

Authors:  Ines Vielgut; Patrick Sadoghi; Matthias Wolf; Lukas Holzer; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Schwantzer; Rudolf Poolman; Bernhard Frankl; Mathias Glehr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Sebastian Vogt; Martin Reinsch; Hubert Büchner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Routine one-stage exchange for chronic infection after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Régis Lengert; Yann Diesinger; Jeannot Gaudias; Cyril Boeri; Jean-François Kempf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  CORR Insights(®): The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thoralf Randolph Liebs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Early-onset infection after hemiarthroplasty of the hip: an algorithm for surgical therapy].

Authors:  M Wick; I Maul; G Muhr
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.