Literature DB >> 16330992

Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty.

Yutaka Inaba1, Lawrence D Dorr, Zhinian Wan, Leighellen Sirianni, Myriam Boutary.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Technical and patient care improvements have occurred with the posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that these changes would provide better results for patients. The clinical and radiographic results of 100 total hip arthroplasties done with the posterior mini incision between January 2004 and October 2004 were compared with 100 mini-incision total hip arthroplasties done between December 2001 and September 2002. There were no differences in diagnosis, age, and body mass index of the patients in each group. Component positions were not compromised in either group. There were improvements in the 2004 group with decreased hospital stay, reduction of postoperative pain and opioid analgesic use, reduced use of assistive devices, and earlier muscle recovery. In the 2004 group there were no complications of infection, dislocation, or sciatic palsy. The posterior mini-incision operation has shown improved results with experience and changes in technique and patient care treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16330992     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000193811.23706.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Hirata; Mio Akiyama; Takashi Itokawa; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Making minimally invasive THR safe: conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis.

Authors:  P C Noble; J D Johnston; J A Alexander; M T Thompson; M M Usrey; E M Heinrich; G C Landon; K B Mathis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Patrick M Morgan; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Manish Dastane; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Fink; A Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.

Authors:  William T Long; Manish Dastane; Michael J Harris; Zhinian Wan; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - trend or state of the art?: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; R Bieger; D Wernerus; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports.

Authors:  James Chow; Brad Penenberg; Stephen Murphy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-09

10.  Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture using the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Katsuo Shitoto; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.