Kristian E Markon1, Robert F Krueger. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Ekkiott Hall, 75 E. River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. mark0060@tc.umn.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Patterns of genetic, environmental, and phenotypic relationships among antisocial behavior and substance use disorders indicate the presence of a common externalizing liability. However, whether this liability is relatively continuous and graded, or categorical and class-like, has not been well established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the fit of categorical and continuous models of externalizing liability in a large, nationally representative sample. DESIGN: Categorical and continuous models of externalizing liability were compared using interview data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). SETTING: Face-to-face interviews conducted in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 43 093 noninstitutionalized adult civilians living in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime and current (past 12 months) diagnoses of antisocial personality disorder, nicotine dependence, alcohol dependence, marijuana dependence, cocaine dependence, and other substance dependence. RESULTS: In the entire sample, as well as for males and females separately, using either lifetime or current diagnoses, the best-fitting model of externalizing liability was a continuous normal model. Moreover, there was a general trend toward latent trait models fitting better than latent class models, indicating that externalizing liability was continuous and graded, rather than categorical and class-like. CONCLUSIONS: Liability to externalizing spectrum disorders is graded and continuous normal in distribution. Research regarding etiology, assessment, and treatment of externalizing disorders should target externalizing liability over a range of severity. Current diagnoses represent extremes of this continuous liability distribution, indicating that conditions currently classified as subthreshold are likely to provide important information regarding liability to externalizing phenomena.
CONTEXT: Patterns of genetic, environmental, and phenotypic relationships among antisocial behavior and substance use disorders indicate the presence of a common externalizing liability. However, whether this liability is relatively continuous and graded, or categorical and class-like, has not been well established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the fit of categorical and continuous models of externalizing liability in a large, nationally representative sample. DESIGN: Categorical and continuous models of externalizing liability were compared using interview data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). SETTING: Face-to-face interviews conducted in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 43 093 noninstitutionalized adult civilians living in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime and current (past 12 months) diagnoses of antisocial personality disorder, nicotine dependence, alcohol dependence, marijuana dependence, cocaine dependence, and other substance dependence. RESULTS: In the entire sample, as well as for males and females separately, using either lifetime or current diagnoses, the best-fitting model of externalizing liability was a continuous normal model. Moreover, there was a general trend toward latent trait models fitting better than latent class models, indicating that externalizing liability was continuous and graded, rather than categorical and class-like. CONCLUSIONS: Liability to externalizing spectrum disorders is graded and continuous normal in distribution. Research regarding etiology, assessment, and treatment of externalizing disorders should target externalizing liability over a range of severity. Current diagnoses represent extremes of this continuous liability distribution, indicating that conditions currently classified as subthreshold are likely to provide important information regarding liability to externalizing phenomena.
Authors: Christopher M Butt; Nathan M King; Scott R Hutton; Allan C Collins; Jerry A Stitzel Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Jack C Sipe; Kyle Chiang; Alexandra L Gerber; Ernest Beutler; Benjamin F Cravatt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-06-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Frederic Boy; C John Evans; Richard A E Edden; Andrew D Lawrence; Krish D Singh; Masud Husain; Petroc Sumner Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Craig Rodriguez-Seijas; Nicholas R Eaton; Malki Stohl; Pia M Mauro; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Thomas S Kubarych; Kenneth S Kendler; Steven H Aggen; Ryne Estabrook; Alexis C Edwards; Shaunna L Clark; Nicholas G Martin; Ian B Hickie; Michael C Neale; Nathan A Gillespie Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Carlos Blanco; María García-Anaya; Melanie Wall; José Carlos Pérez de Los Cobos; Ewelina Swierad; Shuai Wang; Nancy M Petry Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 4.492