Literature DB >> 16329247

Comparative analysis of morphological diversity: does disparity accumulate at the same rate in two lineages of centrarchid fishes?

David C Collar1, Thomas J Near, Peter C Wainwright.   

Abstract

Evolutionary lineages differ with regard to the variety of forms they exhibit. We investigated whether comparisons of morphological diversity can be used to identify differences in ecological diversity in two sister clades of centrarchid fishes. Species in the Lepomis clade (sunfishes) feed on a wider range of prey items than species in the Micropterus clade (black basses). We quantified disparity in morphology of the feeding apparatus as within-clade variance on principal components and found that Lepomis exhibits 4.4 and 7.4 times more variance than Micropterus on the first two principal components. However, lineages are expected to diversify morphologically and ecologically given enough time, and this pattern could have arisen due to differences in the amount of time each clade has had to accumulate variance. Despite being sister groups, the age of the most recent common ancestor of Lepomis is approximately 14.6 million years ago and its lineages have a total length of 86.4 million years while the age of the most recent common ancestor of Micropterus is only about 8.4 million years ago, and it has a total branch length of 42.9 million years. We used the Brownian motion model of character evolution to test the hypothesis that time of independent evolution of each clade's lineages accounts for differences in morphological disparity and determined that the rates of evolution of the first two principal components are 4.4 and 7.7 times greater in Lepomis. Thus, time and phylogeny do not account for the differences in morphological disparity observed in Lepomis and Micropterus, and other diversity-promoting mechanisms should be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16329247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  19 in total

1.  Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds.

Authors:  Gavin H Thomas; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Model for macroevolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Yosef E Maruvka; Nadav M Shnerb; David A Kessler; Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  David Ackerly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bentho-pelagic divergence of cichlid feeding architecture was prodigious and consistent during multiple adaptive radiations within African rift-lakes.

Authors:  W James Cooper; Kevin Parsons; Alyssa McIntyre; Brittany Kern; Alana McGee-Moore; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A promising future for integrative biodiversity research: an increased role of scale-dependency and functional biology.

Authors:  S A Price; L Schmitz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Patterns of Differentiation and Disparity in Cranial Morphology in Rodent Species of the genus Megadontomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae).

Authors:  Rachel M Vallejo; José Antonio Guerrero; Francisco X González-Cózatl
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Modelled three-dimensional suction accuracy predicts prey capture success in three species of centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Emily A Kane; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Habitat use affects morphological diversification in dragon lizards.

Authors:  D C Collar; J A Schulte; B C O'Meara; J B Losos
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Assessing the Goodness of Fit of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods: A Meta-Analysis and Simulation Study.

Authors:  Dwueng-Chwuan Jhwueng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nocturnality constrains morphological and functional diversity in the eyes of reef fishes.

Authors:  Lars Schmitz; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.