Literature DB >> 16328931

Alcohol- and light-induced electro-oculographic responses: variability and clinical utility.

Michael F Marmor1, Kathy H C Wu.   

Abstract

The alcohol-induced electro-oculographic (EOG) response has been proposed by Arden as an indicator of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) integrity. We have evaluated the consistency of the alcohol-EOG with respect to clinical applicability and compared this response to the ISCEV-standard EOG. We recorded, in a group of normal subjects (n=29, 14 men with mean age 42+/-11 years and 15 women with mean age 36+/-13 years), the alcohol response to a single oral dose of ethanol at 160 mg/kg (as 40 proof vodka, drunk in 15 s after 12 h of fasting), followed by an ISCEV-standard EOG 90 min after alcohol administration. Blood alcohol levels were monitored at regular intervals with a breath analyzer. We found a wide range of amplitudes in both light and alcohol responses among participants, from minimal to large values. Subjects had a wide range of blood alcohol concentrations from 0.02 to 0.10%; near the time of the response peak, but there was no relationship between alcohol levels and peak/baseline ratios. In addition, there was no relationship between alcohol peak/baseline ratio and the Arden ratio. Neither the alcohol nor the light response parameters showed any relationship with age or gender. Some of the inter-individual variability in the EOG response to alcohol may reflect variable absorption of oral alcohol. The alcohol-induced EOG has too broad a range of responses to be useful clinically for the one-time evaluation of individual patients. We have similar concerns regarding clinical applications of the standard light-induced EOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328931     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-005-0648-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  34 in total

1.  The elimination rate of mouth alcohol: mathematical modeling and implications in breath alcohol analysis.

Authors:  R G Gullberg
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy: towards a set of diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  P J Francis; A Marinescu; F W Fitzke; A C Bird; G E Holder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Clinical electrophysiology of the retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  M F Marmor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  ERG and EOG abnormalities in carriers of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  P Stavrou; P A Good; E J Broadhurst; S Bundey; A R Fielder; S J Crews
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Relative effects of aging and age-related macular degeneration on peripheral visual function.

Authors:  K Holopigian; W Seiple; V Greenstein; D Kim; R E Carr
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Retinopathy secondary to rubella.

Authors:  A E Krill
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1972

7.  Sequential recording of photic and nonphotic electro-oculogram responses in patients with extensive extramacular drusen.

Authors:  L Y Gupta; M F Marmor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Electrophysiologic tests in assessment of senile macular degeneration.

Authors:  M Marcus; S Merin; M Wolf; M Feinsod
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03

9.  The electrooculogram and its interindividual and intraindividual variability.

Authors:  A Zonneveldt; G van Lith
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Effects of ethyl alcohol on the directly recorded standing potential of the human eye.

Authors:  K O Skoog; O Textorius; S E Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1975-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Alcohol- and light-induced electro-oculographic responses in age-related macular degeneration & central serous chorioretinopathy. alcohol- and light-induced EOG responses in ARMD & CSC.

Authors:  Kathy H C Wu; Michael F Marmor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of clinical electro-oculography values.

Authors:  Paul A Constable; David Ngo; Stephen Quinn; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Light and alcohol evoked electro-oculograms in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Paul A Constable; John G Lawrenson; Geoffrey B Arden
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Nifedipine alters the light-rise of the electro-oculogram in man.

Authors:  Paul A Constable
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.