Literature DB >> 29019002

A meta-analysis of clinical electro-oculography values.

Paul A Constable1, David Ngo2, Stephen Quinn3, Dorothy A Thompson4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the meta-analysis was to derive a range of mean normal clinical electrooculogram (EOG) values from a systematic review of published EOG studies that followed the guidelines of the ISCEV standard for clinical electro-oculography.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using four relevant databases limited to peer-reviewed articles in English between 1967 and February 2017. Studies reporting clinical EOG or FO normal values were included when the report used a standard 30° horizontal saccade, a retinal luminance of between 100 and 250 cd m-2, and had > 10 subjects in their normative values. The search identified 1145 articles after duplicates were removed with subsequent screening of the abstracts excluding a further 1098, resulting in 47 full-text articles that were then assessed by the author (PC) with a final nine articles meeting the inclusion criteria. An overall effect estimate using inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis was performed to estimate the mean values for the light peak/dark trough ratio (LP:DT ratio) (dilated and undilated), the time to the LP, the amplitude of the LP, dark trough (DT) and the fast oscillation (FO) peak-to-trough ratio from the included studies.
RESULTS: The mean dilated LP:DT ratio was 2.35 (95% CI 2.28-2.42); undilated LP:DT ratio was 2.37 (95% CI 2.28-2.45); LP amplitude was 835 (95% CI 631-1039) µV and the mean time to the LP being 8.2 (95% CI 7.7-8.7) min. The mean DT amplitude was 358 (95% CI 292-424) µV, and the mean FO peak-to-trough ratio was 1.13 (95% CI 1.11-1.16). The results of the LP/DT ratio are drawn from studies with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 34.08 ± 12.93 years for dilated and 33.65 ± 12.28 years for undilated LP/DT ratios.
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis of EOG studies has generated a reference range of normal mean values for clinicians to refer to when using the ISCEV clinical EOG. It provides a potential method to generate similar data sets from published normal values in related visual electrophysiology tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dark trough; Electro-oculogram; Fast oscillation; ISCEV; LP:DT ratio; Light peak

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29019002     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-017-9616-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  72 in total

1.  ISCEV standard for clinical electro-oculography (2010 update).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Mitchell G Brigell; Daphne L McCulloch; Carol A Westall; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; Graham E Holder; Daphne L McCulloch; Atsushi Mizota; Alma Patrizia Tormene
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  EOG in a large family with hereditary macular degeneration. (Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy) identification of gene carriers.

Authors:  W Thorburn; S Nordström
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1978-06

4.  The optimum illuminance level for clinical electro-oculography.

Authors:  S A Jackson
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1979-08

Review 5.  ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition).

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Jonathan S Lyons; Michael F Marmor; Daphne L McCulloch; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Light and alcohol evoked electro-oculograms in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Paul A Constable; John G Lawrenson; Geoffrey B Arden
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The fast oscillation of the electro-oculogram. Influence of stimulus intensity and adaptation time on amplitude and peak latency.

Authors:  A R Thaler; M R Lessel; P Heilig; V Scheiber
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Retinal pigment epithelial dysfunction in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome: implications for the theory of pathogenesis.

Authors:  V C Greenstein; W Seiple; J Liebmann; R Ritch
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09

9.  Ophthalmological assessment of cannabis-induced persisting perception disorder: is there a direct retinal effect?

Authors:  Ditta Zobor; Torsten Strasser; Gergely Zobor; Franziska Schober; Andre Messias; Olaf Strauss; Anil Batra; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  ISCEV Standard for clinical electro-oculography (2017 update).

Authors:  Paul A Constable; Michael Bach; Laura J Frishman; Brett G Jeffrey; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is white the right light for the clinical electrooculogram?

Authors:  Paul A Constable; Garima Kapoor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Electro-oculography in bilateral optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Padmini Dahanayake; Tharaka L Dassanayake; Manoji Pathirage; Saman Senanayake; Mike Sedgwick; Vajira Weerasinghe
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-06-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.