Literature DB >> 16328416

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a powder-filled capsule formulation of oral irinotecan (CPT-11) given daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Henry C Pitot1, Alex A Adjei, Joel M Reid, Jeff A Sloan, Pamela J Atherton, Joseph Rubin, Steven R Alberts, Barbara A Duncan, Louis Denis, Larry J Schaaf, Donghua Yin, Amarnath Sharma, Patrick McGovren, Langdon L Miller, Charles Erlichman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intravenous (i.v.) irinotecan is a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor with broad clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer and other tumors. The development of an oral formulation of irinotecan could enhance convenience and lessen the expense of palliative irinotecan delivery. This phase I study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of irinotecan given as a powder-filled capsule (PFC) daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of oral irinotecan daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Plasma samples were collected following the first and fifth doses of irinotecan during Cycle 1 to determine the PK of irinotecan and its major circulating metabolites: SN-38, SN-38G, and APC.
RESULTS: 20 patients (median age 61.5 years, range 40-75; M/F 12/8; ECOG PS 0=5, 1=11, 2=4) received oral irinotecan at dose levels of 30 (n=3), 40 (n=3), 50 (n=6), and 60 (n=8) mg/m(2)/day. Of the eight patients enrolled at 60 mg/m(2), three patients experienced DLT (> or = grade 3) consisting of nausea (three patients), vomiting (three patients), diarrhea (two patients), and febrile neutropenia (two patients) for which all the three patients required hospitalization. Treatment of six patients at the 50-mg/m(2) dose level resulted in no DLT. Other toxicities observed include abdominal pain, alopecia, anorexia, and asthenia. After oral administration, irinotecan was rapidly absorbed into systemic circulation and converted to the active metabolite SN-38. Increasing dose levels resulted in a dose-dependent increase in mean exposure parameters (Cmax and AUC) of irinotecan and metabolites. Systemic exposure parameters (Cmax and AUC(0-24)) of irinotecan and SN-38 were comparable between days 1 and 5. The extent of conversion from irinotecan to SN-38 was approximately threefold higher after the oral administration compared to that previously observed after i.v. administration. The exposure parameters of irinotecan or SN-38 are of limited value in predicting severity of Cycle 1 toxicities in the twofold dose range evaluated.
CONCLUSION: Daily oral administration of irinotecan as the PFC formulation for 5 days every 3 weeks can safely deliver protracted exposure to SN-38, with the MTD of 50 mg/m(2)/d.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328416     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-005-0138-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

1.  A single-arm pilot phase II study of gefitinib and irinotecan in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; M Beth McCarville; Mihaela Onciu; Andrew M Davidoff; Sandy Kovach; Dana Hawkins; Valerie McPherson; Peter J Houghton; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Clinton F Stewart; Victor M Santana
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Wayne L Furman; Fariba Navid; Najat C Daw; M Beth McCarville; Lisa M McGregor; Sheri L Spunt; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; John C Panetta; Kristine R Crews; Jianrong Wu; Amar J Gajjar; Peter J Houghton; Victor M Santana; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature.

Authors:  Vincent J Venditto; Eric E Simanek
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Femke M de Man; Andrew K L Goey; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Oral administration of irinotecan in patients with solid tumors: an open-label, phase I, dose escalating study evaluating safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  I Kümler; P Grundtvig Sørensen; J Palshof; E Høgdall; W Skovrider-Ruminski; S Theile; A Fullerton; P G Nielsen; B Vittrup Jensen; D L Nielsen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  A Proximal-to-Distal Survey of Healthy Adult Human Small Intestine and Colon Epithelium by Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Joseph Burclaff; R Jarrett Bliton; Keith A Breau; Meryem T Ok; Ismael Gomez-Martinez; Jolene S Ranek; Aadra P Bhatt; Jeremy E Purvis; John T Woosley; Scott T Magness
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Supramolecular Crafting of Self-Assembling Camptothecin Prodrugs with Enhanced Efficacy against Primary Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Hao Su; Pengcheng Zhang; Andrew G Cheetham; Jin Mo Koo; Ran Lin; Asad Masood; Paula Schiapparelli; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Honggang Cui
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 11.556

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.