Literature DB >> 16328262

The symmetry of interlimb transfer depends on workspace locations.

Jinsung Wang1, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that when both arms learn visuo-motor tasks within the shared midline workspace, transfer becomes asymmetrical: initial direction information only transfers from the nondominant to the dominant arm, whereas the final position information only transfers from the dominant to the nondominant arm. We now examine whether symmetry of interlimb transfer depends on the location of workspace provided for the two arms, by investigating the pattern of interlimb transfer when each arm adapts to a 30 degree rotation at its ipsilateral workspace. All subjects performed center-out reaching movements while adapting to a 30 degree rotation in the visual display. Half the subjects performed with the nondominant arm first and then the dominant arm, while the other half performed with the dominant arm first and then the nondominant arm. To assess transfer, naïve performance and the performance following opposite arm adaptation were compared for each arm separately. Our results indicate unambiguous transfer that is symmetrical: both arms benefited from opposite arm training in terms of initial direction control. In terms of final position information, neither arm benefited from opposite arm training. This clearly demonstrates that symmetry of interlimb transfer depends on the location of workspace provided for the two arms. Our findings suggest that when visuo-motor tasks are performed within a shared midline workspace, the nondominant controller is selectively inhibited from access to dominant controller information, due to a certain competition between the two limb/hemisphere systems that is introduced by the shared nature of the workspace.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328262     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0230-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; R A Baguley; P J Bairstow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans.

Authors:  G Thut; N D Cook; M Regard; K L Leenders; U Halsband; T Landis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dual task interactions due exclusively to limits in processing resources.

Authors:  J D Holtzman; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  21 in total

1.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Aging reduces asymmetries in interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Andrzej Przybyla; Kati Wuebbenhorst; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Activity-dependent plasticity improves M1 motor representation and corticospinal tract connectivity.

Authors:  S Chakrabarty; K M Friel; J H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effects of aging on the asymmetry of inter-limb transfer in a visuomotor task.

Authors:  Zhujun Pan; Arend W A Van Gemmert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Inter-limb transfer of learned ankle movements.

Authors:  Tiffany Morris; Nicki Ann Newby; Michael Wininger; William Craelius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A dissociation between visual and motor workspace inhibits generalization of visuomotor adaptation across the limbs.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Challenging balance during sensorimotor adaptation increases generalization.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; J Maxwell Donelan; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Separation of visual and motor workspaces during targeted reaching results in limited generalization of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Michelle J Johnson; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.