Literature DB >> 16327780

The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores.

Benjamin A Pinsky1, Charles Kung, Kevan M Shokat, Sue Biggins.   

Abstract

The spindle checkpoint ensures accurate chromosome segregation by delaying cell-cycle progression until all sister kinetochores capture microtubules from opposite poles and come under tension (for reviews, see refs 1, 2). Although the checkpoint is activated by either the lack of kinetochore-microtubule attachments or defects in the tension exerted by microtubule-generated forces, it is not clear whether these signals are linked. We investigated the connection between tension and attachment by studying the conserved budding yeast Ipl1Aurora protein kinase that is required for checkpoint activation in the absence of tension but not attachment. Here, we show that spindle-checkpoint activation in kinetochore mutants that seem to have unattached kinetochores depends on Ipl1 activity. When Ipl1 function was impaired in these kinetochore mutants, the attachments were restored and the checkpoint was turned off. These data indicate that Ipl1 activates the checkpoint in response to tension defects by creating unattached kinetochores. Moreover, although the Dam1 kinetochore complex has been implicated as a key downstream target, we found the existence of unidentified Ipl1 sites on Dam1 or additional important substrates that regulate both microtuble detachment and the checkpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16327780     DOI: 10.1038/ncb1341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  156 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance or the cuckoo clock.

Authors:  Jonathon Pines; Iain Hagan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Mitosis in vertebrates: the G2/M and M/A transitions and their associated checkpoints.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Gagan D Gupta; Wei Zhang; Mikhail Bashkurov; Marie-Claude Landry; Laurence Pelletier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  The signaling network that silences the spindle assembly checkpoint upon the establishment of chromosome bipolar attachment.

Authors:  Fengzhi Jin; Yanchang Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A pathway containing the Ipl1/aurora protein kinase and the spindle midzone protein Ase1 regulates yeast spindle assembly.

Authors:  Chitra V Kotwaliwale; Stéphanie Buvelot Frei; Bodo M Stern; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 9.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Shugoshin prevents cohesin cleavage by PP2A(Cdc55)-dependent inhibition of separase.

Authors:  Dean Clift; Farid Bizzari; Adele L Marston
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.