Literature DB >> 16326299

Hemodynamic measurements after cardiac surgery: transesophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter.

Jeetendra Sharma1, Milind Bhise, Ajmer Singh, Yatin Mehta, Naresh Trehan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare hemodynamic data derived from the transesophageal Doppler monitor (Medicina TECO, Berkshire, United Kingdom) against those obtained from a pulmonary artery catheter after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, clinical study.
SETTING: Single, tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five adult patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac output and hemodynamic variables were measured and compared at 4 predefined time points in patients undergoing elective off-pump CABG surgery from January 2003 through June 2003. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 140 pairs for cardiac output (CO) data were obtained. Transesophageal cardiac output (TECO) values ranged from 1.9 to 8.7 L/min. Thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) values ranged from 2.7 to 7.6 L/min. Matched measurements were made with each patient at intervals of 30 minutes. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of 1.18 +/- 1.36 L/min, with a correlation (r) of 0.593 (p < 0.000) between TECO and TDCO. Similarly poor correlation was observed among cardiac index (r = 0.523), stroke volume (r = 0.615), systemic vascular resistance (r = 0.595), left ventricular stroke work index (r = 0.594), and right ventricular stroke work index (r = 0.590) measured by an esophageal Doppler monitor against a pulmonary artery catheter.
CONCLUSION: A transesophageal Doppler device (Medicina TECO) cannot be relied on as a sole method for monitoring cardiac output and derived hemodynamic variables in patients after CABG surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16326299     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  8 in total

Review 1.  Transesophageal Doppler devices: A technical review.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Mitchell Levy; Peter J D Andrews; Jean Chastre; Leonard D Hudson; Constantine Manthous; G Umberto Meduri; Rui P Moreno; Christian Putensen; Thomas Stewart; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Use of transesophageal Doppler as a sole cardiac output monitor for reperfusion hemodynamic changes during living donor liver transplantation: An observational study.

Authors:  M Hussien; E Refaat; N Fayed; K Yassen; M Khalil; W Mourad
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

5.  Is cardiac anaesthesiologist the best person to look after cardiac critical care?

Authors:  Yatin Mehta
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

6.  Recent trends on hemodynamic monitoring in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dheeraj Arora; Yatin Mehta
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dominic P Recco; Nathalie Roy; Alexander J Gregory; Kevin W Lobdell
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-11

8.  Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection.

Authors:  Osama A El Sharkawy; Emad K Refaat; Abdel Elmoniem M Ibraheem; Wafiya R Mahdy; Nirmeen A Fayed; Wesam S Mourad; Hanaa S Abd Elhafez; Khaled A Yassen
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.