The advantage of cyclic over discrete movements remains evident following changes in load and amplitude.

Previous studies suggested that the advantage in speed accuracy trade-off of cyclic over discrete aiming tasks with the upper limbs may be associated with the operation of spinal neural oscillators, as in locomotion. Similar to the locomotor rhythm that is fairly robust and can accommodate changes in loading or stride length, we predicted that cyclic aiming tasks would be equally resistant to changes in load or amplitude, thereby preserving the advantage over discrete tasks. To test the hypothesis, cyclic and discrete aiming movements were performed with and without loading of the hand. Furthermore a "complex" condition was introduced in which the distance between the targets that the participants moved to alternated between 2.5 and 5 cm. In all cases, two target sizes were used to test spatial accuracy and to be able to calculate the Index of Performance (IP). Findings revealed that even though part of the advantage of the cyclic over the discrete regime was lost during the complex movement pattern and with addition of weight, the former remained superior to the latter. Furthermore, adding weight did not change the oscillation frequency in the cyclic movements. It is concluded that the superiority of cyclic movements over discrete ones is fairly robust, consistent with the high degree of flexibility that is typically observed in neural oscillators.