Literature DB >> 23099550

Additional load decreases movement time in the wrist but not in arm movements at ID 6.

Stefan Panzer1, Jason B Boyle, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

An experiment using reciprocal arm and wrist aiming movements with an amplitude of 16(o) and target width of .5° (ID = 6) was conducted to determine the impact of adding external loads. We predicted that wrist and arm performance may be differentially impacted by the added mass. Participants were asked to flex/extend their limb/lever in a horizontal plane at the wrist (arm stabilized) or elbow joint (wrist stabilized) in an attempt to move back and forth between the two targets as quickly and accurately as possible. External loads of 0, .568, or 1.136 kg were fixed at the distal end of the limb/lever. The targets and the current position of the limb were projected on the screen in front of the participant. The results indicated significant Group × Load interactions for movement time and percent time to peak velocity. Movement time decreased as load increased for the wrist but remained stable across loads for arm movements. Percent movement time utilized to accelerate the limb increased as load increased for wrist movements but only increased from 0 to .568 kg load for the arm movements. For both groups increased load had no significant effect on endpoint variability. The present findings suggest that the additional load allowed the control advantages of the wrist muscles to be exploited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099550     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3303-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Adaptations in arm movements for added mass to wrist or ankle during walking.

Authors:  S F Donker; Th Mulder; B Nienhuis; J Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge.

Authors:  E HENNEMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-12-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Terminal accuracy of unexpectedly loaded rapid movements: evidence for a mass-spring mechanism in programming.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; C McGown
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  The curvature and variability of wrist and arm movements.

Authors:  Steven K Charles; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review.

Authors:  Paul R Davidson; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  The effect of target size and inertial load on the control of rapid aiming movements. A test of speed-sensitive and speed-insensitive strategies.

Authors:  M A Khan; M I Garry; I M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Common principles underlying the control of rapid, single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints.

Authors:  K D Pfann; D S Hoffman; G L Gottlieb; P L Strick; D M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Extended practice of reciprocal wrist and arm movements of varying difficulties.

Authors:  Jason Boyle; Stefan Panzer; David Wright; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-05-23

Review 9.  Feedback control of skeletal muscles.

Authors:  J Houk; E Henneman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; J E Smith; C E Wright
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Physical Demand but Not Dexterity Is Associated with Motor Flexibility during Rapid Reaching in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Christian Greve; Tibor Hortobàgyi; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.