Literature DB >> 16325617

Regret, satisfaction, and symptom improvement: analysis of the impact of partial colpocleisis for the management of severe pelvic organ prolapse.

Thomas L Wheeler1, Holly E Richter, Kathryn L Burgio, David T Redden, C C Grace Chen, Patricia S Goode, R Edward Varner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess a cohort of patients who underwent a colpocleisis procedure more than 1 year post operation to determine: 1) the proportion of patients who regretted having the procedure, 2) patient satisfaction with the procedure, and 3) changes in symptom severity after surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Using the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Genitourinary Disorders Center database, a prospective analysis was performed on 54 patients who underwent colpocleisis between August 1996 and April 2003. From August to October of 2004, participants were contacted by an investigator not involved with the surgery and were asked 1) "do you regret having your surgery, and, if so, why?," 2) "how satisfied are you with your progress (completely, somewhat, or not)?," and 3) to repeat the short form Incontinence Impact Questionnaire/Urogenital Distress Inventory (IIQ-7/UDI-6).
RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent (32/54) of potential candidates participated in the study. Nine percent (3/32) of patients regretted having colpocleisis performed. Fifty-seven percent (16/28) were completely satisfied, 29% (8/28) somewhat satisfied, and 14% (4/28) not satisfied. Mean IIQ score improved significantly from 40.9 (+/-31.7) at baseline to 14.1 (+/-26.7) at last interview (P = .003). Mean UDI score improved significantly from 63.1 (+/-24.3) at baseline to 24.2 (+/-26.7) at last interview (P = .001). There was a negative correlation between change in UDI scores with time since procedure (r = -.397, P = .055) and age (r = -.435, P = .034).
CONCLUSION: Few patients reported regret after partial colpocleisis. There was a high rate of patient satisfaction and significant symptom improvement more than a year post surgery. Stable but smaller improvements were reported with longer time from surgery and increasing age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16325617     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bochenska; Alix Leader-Cramer; Margaret Mueller; Bhumy Davé; Alexandria Alverdy; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Long-term follow-up after colpocleisis: regret, bowel, and bladder function.

Authors:  M Vij; L Bombieri; A Dua; R Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Ana Wilson; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  How does colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in older women affect quality of life, body image, and sexuality? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Laetitia Felder; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Tilemachos Kavvadias
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 5.  Colpocleisis as an obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: is it still a viable option in the twenty-first century? Narrative review.

Authors:  Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Konrad Futyma; Aida Kusiak; Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 1.932

6.  Labhardt's colpoperineocleisis: subjective results of an alternative treatment for genital prolapse in patients who are not sexually active--2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Gonzalo Galleguillos; Rodrigo Cuevas; Bernardita Blümel; Alejandro Pattillo; Silvana González; Alejandro Majerson; Oslando Padilla; Mauricio Cuello; Juan Andrés Ortiz; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis.

Authors:  M P Fitzgerald; H E Richter; C S Bradley; W Ye; A C Visco; G W Cundiff; H M Zyczynski; P Fine; A M Weber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-08-09

Review 8.  Prolapse and incontinence surgery in older women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Gerten; Alayne D Markland; L Keith Lloyd; Holly E Richter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.