Literature DB >> 16325486

Patterns of size sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis: another look.

S-H Lee1.   

Abstract

Size sexual dimorphism is one of the major components of morphological variation and has been associated with socio-ecology and behavioral variables such as mating patterns. Although several studies have addressed the magnitude and pattern of sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis, one of the earliest hominids, consensus has yet to be reached. This paper uses assigned re-sampling method, a data re-sampling method to estimate the magnitude of sexual dimorphism without relying on individual sex assessments, to examine the fossil hominid sample from Hadar. Two questions are asked: first, whether sexual dimorphism in a selected sample of skeletal elements of A. afarensis is the same as that in living humans, chimpanzees, or gorillas; and second, whether different skeletal elements reflect variation in sexual dimorphism in the same way. All possible metric variables were used as data in applying the method, including seven variables from three elements (mandibular canine, humerus, femur). Analyses show that A. afarensis is similar in size sexual dimorphism to gorillas in femoral variables, to humans in humeral variables, and to chimpanzees in canine variables. The results of this study are compatible with the hypothesis that the pattern of sexual dimorphism in A. afarensis is different from any that are observed in living humans or apes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16325486     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2005.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Homo        ISSN: 0018-442X


  3 in total

1.  A cephalometric study of skulls from the Bahriyah oasis.

Authors:  Moushira Erfan Zaki; Muhammad Al-Tohamy Soliman; Hala T El-Bassyouni
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2012-07

2.  Sexual dimorphism in Homo erectus inferred from 1.5 Ma footprints near Ileret, Kenya.

Authors:  Brian Villmoare; Kevin G Hatala; William Jungers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics.

Authors:  Susan J Dykes; Varsha C Pilbrow
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.