Literature DB >> 16325082

Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Stavros Ristanis1, Nicholas Stergiou, Kostas Patras, Haris S Vasiliadis, Giannis Giakas, Anastasios D Georgoulis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent in vitro research has suggested that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction does not restore control of tibial rotation. The purpose of this study was to explore these findings in vivo and investigate rotational knee stability during landing and subsequent pivoting. Such an activity places higher demands on the knee, almost similar to those found during high-level sports. TYPE OF STUDY: Case control series study.
METHODS: We assessed 11 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with the same arthroscopic technique using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, 11 ACL-deficient subjects who had sustained the injury more than 1 year prior to testing, and 11 matched controls. Kinematic data were collected (50 Hz) with a 6-camera optoelectronic system while the subjects performed the following task: they jumped off a 40-cm platform and landed on the ground. After foot contact, the subjects were instructed to pivot at 90 degrees and walk away from the platform. The evaluation period was identified from initial foot contact with the ground with both legs, included the pivoting of the ipsilateral leg, and was completed on touchdown of the contralateral leg.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the reconstructed leg of the ACL group and the healthy control, and between the deficient leg of the ACL-deficient group and the healthy control. We also found no significant differences between the deficient leg of the ACL-deficient group and the reconstructed leg of the ACL reconstructed group.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that, under high-stress activities, ACL reconstruction may not restore tibial rotation to the previous physiological level, even though anterior tibial translation is restored. Future research on ACL reconstruction should focus on the development of new surgical procedures and/or grafts to address this problem. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16325082     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  60 in total

1.  Internal tibial rotation during in vivo, dynamic activity induces greater sliding of tibio-femoral joint contact on the medial compartment.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Kinematic predictors of subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo motion analysis study.

Authors:  Franceska Zampeli; Evangelos Pappas; Dimitrios Giotis; Michael E Hantes; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstructions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Songcen Lu; Chad Hume; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Yuichi Hoshino; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Consideration of growth factors and bio-scaffolds for treatment of combined grade II MCL and ACL injury.

Authors:  Natasha Anoka; John Nyland; Mark McGinnis; Dave Lee; Mahmut Nedim Doral; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  M Otani; M Nozaki; M Kobayashi; H Goto; K Tawada; Y Waguri-Nagaya; H Okamoto; H Iguchi; N Watanabe; T Otsuka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  Hidenori Otsubo; Konsei Shino; Norimasa Nakamura; Ken Nakata; Shigeto Nakagawa; Maki Koyanagi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Tibial bone bridge and bone block fixation in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without hardware: a technical note.

Authors:  R Siebold; H Thierjung; K Cafaltzis; E Hoeschele; J Tao; T Ellert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; Kilian Friedrich; Tobias Gotterbarm; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ekdahl; James H-C Wang; Mario Ronga; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.